Not a member yet? Why not Sign up today
Create an account  

Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 517
» Latest member: moh2
» Forum threads: 431
» Forum posts: 1,011

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 47 online users.
» 1 Member(s) | 45 Guest(s)
Bing

Latest Threads
Unified Field Theory by V...
Forum: General Science
Last Post: Mozart
11-26-2025, 11:28 AM
» Replies: 7
» Views: 653
Russian Tesla coil setup ...
Forum: Alternative & Free Energy
Last Post: ScalarPotential
11-22-2025, 08:26 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 232
My generator that rotates...
Forum: Alternative & Free Energy
Last Post: Mooker
11-19-2025, 02:12 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 392
Benefactors Rodin Coil Gu...
Forum: Alternative & Free Energy
Last Post: ScalarPotential
11-16-2025, 08:22 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 2,476
Self Looped Bedini Motor ...
Forum: Alternative & Free Energy
Last Post: sinergicus
11-08-2025, 03:57 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 518
A Conversation With DR Un...
Forum: General Talk
Last Post: JoeLag
11-03-2025, 01:57 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 134
Fixing the ‘Fatally Flawe...
Forum: General Talk
Last Post: Mister.E.M.F.
11-01-2025, 07:14 AM
» Replies: 14
» Views: 2,292
Free energy from Earth's ...
Forum: Alternative & Free Energy
Last Post: vnachow
10-24-2025, 08:56 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 239
Don Smith Reactive Method
Forum: Alternative & Free Energy
Last Post: JoeLag
10-15-2025, 10:13 PM
» Replies: 43
» Views: 14,203
What can I do with all th...
Forum: Alternative & Free Energy
Last Post: JoeLag
08-30-2025, 06:24 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 676

 
  Telecommunications Free from Electric Smog!
Posted by: JoeLag - 09-20-2023, 07:18 PM - Forum: Files - No Replies

Telecommunications Free from Electric Smog!


.pdf   Telecommunications with standing gravitational waves (G-Com).pdf (Size: 203.24 KB / Downloads: 13)

Print this item

  AN inexpensive apparatus designed by Douglas A. Kohl of Osseo, Minn., for the detecti
Posted by: JoeLag - 09-19-2023, 11:26 PM - Forum: Files - No Replies

AN inexpensive apparatus designed by Douglas A. Kohl of Osseo, Minn., for the detection of gravity waves traveling through the ionosphere


.pdf   Billows in the Ionosphere Are Tracked with Transistor Radios.pdf (Size: 5.54 MB / Downloads: 12)

Print this item

  All About Gravitational Waves - With Most Simple Detector
Posted by: JoeLag - 09-19-2023, 11:23 PM - Forum: Electonic Projects & Schematics - No Replies

All About Gravitational Waves - With Most Simple Detector
 
                          All About Gravitational Waves
                              by Gregory Hodowanec
                        Reproduced without permission from
                      Radio-Electronics magazine April 1986
                            by The Trace - June 1, 1991
      Abstract:
      Are gravitational waves  the  source of noise in electronic devices?
      The author believes so, and describes a simple circuit to detect the
      waves.
      The author has developed a new cosmology that predicts the existance
      of a new  type  of gravitational  signal.  We  are  publishing  the
      results of some of his experiments in the hope that  it  will  foter
      experimentation as well as alternate explanations for his results.
      --------------------------------------------------------------------
      Einstein predicted the  existence of gravity waves - the counterpart
      of light and radio waves - many years  ago.  However,  he predicted
      the existence of  quadrature-type gravity waves.  Unfortunately,  no
      one has been able to detect quadrature-type gravity waves.
      Consequently, the author developed, over the years, a new cosmology,
      or theory of  the  universe,  in  which  monopole  gravity waves are
      predicted.  The author's theory does  not  preclude the existence of
      Einsteinian gravity waves,  but they are viewed as  being  extremely
      weak, very long  in  wavelength,  and  therefore  very  difficult to
      detect unequivocally.  Monopole  signals,  however,  are  relatively
      strong, so they are much more easily detected.
      Monopole gravity waves have been detected for many  years; it's just
      that we've been used to calling them 1/f "noise" signals or flicker
      noise.  Those noise signals can be seen in low-frequency electronic
      circuits.  More recently, such signals have been called Microwave
      Background Radiation (MBR);  most  scientists  believe  that to be a
      relic of the so-called "big bang" that created the universe.
      In the author's  cosmology, the  universe  is  considered  to  be  a
      finite, spherical, closed  system; in other words,  it  is  a  black
      body.
      Monopole gravity waves  "propagate"  any  distance  in  Planck time,
      which is about  10^-44  seconds;  hence,  their  effects  appear
      everywhere almost instantaneously.  The sum total of background flux
                                      Page 1
      in the universe gives rise to the observed microwave temperature, in
      our universe, of about three degrees kelvin.
      Sources of monopole  gravity  waves  include  common  astrophysical
      phenomena like supernovas,  novas,  starquakes,  etc.,  as  well  as
      earthly phenomena like  earthquakes,  core  movements,  etc.  Those
      sorts of cosmic  and  earthly  events  cause  delectable  temporary
      variations in the amount of gravitational-impule  radiation  present
      in the universe.
      Novas, especially supernovas (which are large exploding  stars), are
      very effective generators of oscillatory monopole gravity waves.
      Those signals have a Gaussian waveshape and a lifetime of only a few
      tens of milliseconds.  They  can  readily impart a portion of their
      energy to free particles like molecules, atoms, and electrons.
      The background flux, in general, is  fairly constant.  Variations in
      the backgrouns flux  are  caused  by  movements  of  large  mass
      concentrations like galaxies, super-galaxies, and black holes.
      These movements create gravitational "shadows," analogous to optical
      shadows.  When the  earth-moon-sun  alignment  is  just  right,  the
      gravtational shadow of a small, highly  concentrated mass -- a black
      hole, for example  -- can be detected and tracked  from  the  Earth.
      So, keeping those  facts  in  mind,  let's look at several practical
      methods of detecting gravitational energy.
      Electrons and Capacitors
      ------------------------
      As stated above, gravity-wave energy can be imparted to ordinary
      objects.  Of special interest to us  are the loosely-bound electrons
      in ordinary capacitors.  Perhaps you have wondered how a discharged
      high-valued electrolytic capacitor  (say 1000 uF at  35  volts)  can
      develop a charge  even  though it is disconnected from an electrical
      circuit.
      While some of  that  charging could  be  attributed  to  a  chemical
      reaction in the capacitor, I believe that much of it is caused by
      gravity-wave impulses bathing the capacitor at all  times.  And the
      means by which  gravity  waves transfer energy is similar to another
      means of energy transfer that is  well  known  to  readers of Radio-
      Electronics: the electric field.
      As shown in Fig. 1-a, the presence of a large mass  near  the plates
      of a capacitor  causes a polarized alignment of the molecules in the
      capacitor, as though an external DC voltage had been applied to the
      capacitor, as shown in Fig. 1-b.
      You can verify that yourself:
              Drop a  fully-discharged  1000-uF,  35-volt  electrolytic
              capacitor broadside on a hard surface from a height of
              two or three feet.
              Then measure the voltage across the capacitor  with  a  high-
              impedance voltmeter.
                                      Page 2
              You will  find  a  voltage  of  about  10 to 50 mV.  Drop the
              capacitor several times on opposite sides, don't let it
              bounce, and note how charge  builds  up to a saturation level
              that may be as high as one volt.
      In that experiment,  the  energy  of  free-fall  is  converted  to
      polarization energy in  the  capacitor.  The loosely-bound electrons
      are literally "jarred" into new polarization positions.
      --------------------------------------------------------------------
      Vangard note...
          We must be careful before jumping  to  such  conclusions without
          regard for  the  more  natural  property  of the  piezo-electric
          effect.  Capacitor  construction  can  consist  of  a variety of
          materials, many of which include  a  metal  foil.  Note that all
          metal has a crystalline structure, therefore, all metals to some
          degree possess piezo-electric properties.
          The Piezo-electric property is most easily demonstrated  by  the
          use of  any  crystal,  most  commonly quartz.  When a crystal is
          subjected to  bursts of electrical  energy  occurring  at  sonic
          rates, the  crystal  will  convert  the electrical  energy  into
          mechanical movement  which then percusses the air at the rate of
          the electrical frequencies, i.e. a speaker.
          The inverse of this process can  be  used  to convert mechanical
          pressure into  electrical energy.  Any abrupt  mechanical  shock
          applied to  the  crystal  will  therefore produce electricity, a
          process Keely referred to as "shock excitation."
          In regard to the dropping of the capacitor to allow it to strike
          the floor, the question follows, is the striking on the floor in
          actuality converting the abrupt mechanical shock into electrical
          energy which then does not bleed off until discharged?
          If in fact the movement of a capacitor through space will induce
          a charge on the plates of the  capacitor,  then  we can see some
          interesting possibilities.  Most important of all  the direction
          towards a  free  energy  device  using  the  moving  plates of a
          capacitor.  Maybe this is the  secret  of the Testatika, the M-L
          convertor and others which use electrostatic chopping.
          A more  interesting experiment, indeed, a proof  of  the  claim,
          would be to spin one or more capacitors at various diameters and
          speeds and  monitor the developed voltage.  This could very well
          lead to some quantitative observations.
      --------------------------------------------------------------------
      In a similar  manner,  gravitational  impulses  from  space  "jar"
      electrons into new polarization positions.
      Here's another experiment:
              Monitor a  group  of  similar  capacitors that  have  reached
              equilibrium conditions  while  being  bathed  by  normal
              background gravitational impulses.
              You'll observe that, over a period of time, the voltage
                                      Page 3
              across all those open-circuited capacitors will be equal, and
              that it will depend only on the average background flux at
              the time.  Temperature  should  be  kept  constant  for that
              experiment.
      I interpret those facts to mean that  a  capacitor develops a charge
      that reflects the  monopole  gravity-wave signals existing  at  that
      particular location in  the  universe.  So, although another device
      could be used, we will use a capacitor as the sensing element in the
      gravity-wave detectors described next.
      The simplest detector
      ---------------------
      Monopole gravity waves generate small  impulse  currents that may be
      coupled to an  op-amp configured as a current-to-voltage  converter,
      as shown in  Fig.  2.  The current-to-voltage converter is a nearly
      lossless current-measuring device.
      It gives an output voltage that is  proportional  to  the product of
      the input current  (which  can  be  in  the  picoampere  range)  and
      resistor R1.  Linearity  is  assured  because  the  non-DC-connected
      capacitor maintains the op-amp's input terminals at virtual ground.
      The detector's output may be coupled  to a high-impedance digital or
      analog voltmeter, an  audio  amplifier,  or  an  oscilloscope.    In
      addition, a chart  recorder  could  be  used to record the DC output
      over a period of time, thus providing a record of long-term "shadow-
      drift" effects.
      Resistor R2 and capacitor C2 protect  the  output  of  the  circuit;
      their values will depend on what you're driving.  To experiment, try
      a 1k resistor and a 0.1 uF capacitor.
      The output of  the detector (Eo) may appear in two forms,  depending
      on whether or  not  stabilizing  capacitor Cx is connected.  When it
      is, the output will be highly amplified  1/f noise signals, as shown
      in Fig. 3-a.
      Without Cx, the circuit becomes a "ringing" circuit  with  a slowly-
      decaying output that  has a resonant frequency of 500-600 Hz for the
      component values shown.  In that  configuration,  the  circuit  is a
      Quantum Non-Demolition (QND) circuit, as astrophysicists call it; it
      will now actually display the amplitude variations  (waveshapes)  of
      the passing gravitational-impulse bursts, as shown in Fig. 3-b.
      An interesting variation  on the detector may be built by increasing
      the value of sensing capacitor C1  to  about  1000-1600  uF.  After
      circuit stability is  achieved, the circuit will respond  to  almost
      all gravity-wave signals in the universe.  By listening carefully to
      the audio output  of  the  detector you can hear not only normal 1/f
      noise, but also many "musical" sounds  of  space,  as  well as other
      effects that will not be disclosed here.
      --------------------------------------------------------------------
      Vangard note...
              Several years  earlier, Hodowanec was claiming  that  he  had
              actually made  contact  with  someone on the planet Mars.  He
              said the signals eventually evolved into intelligible
                                      Page 4
              patterns which  indicated  there was a decimated civilization
              still in existence on the planet.
              We have the papers and will  list them in the near future for
              those who might be interested...this is what  he refers to in
              the comment  "other  effects that will not be disclosed here"
              and was due to the national  nature  of the magazine in which
              the article was published.
              He says a cone of receptivity from or to Mars  was the reason
              that the  signals could only be detected at certain locations
              on either planet.  In other  words,  you must be in the right
              place at  the right time and with the right  equipment.  The
              signals essentially used modulated gravitational waves.
      --------------------------------------------------------------------
      An improved detector
      --------------------
      Adding a buffer  stage  to  the  basic circuit, as shown in Fig.  4,
      makes the detector easier to work  with.  The  IC  used is a common
      1458 (which is a dual 741).  One op-amp is used as the detector, and
      the other op-amp multiplies the detector's output by a factor of 20.
      Potentiometer R3 is used to adjust the output to the desired level.
      When used unshielded,  the  circuits  presented here  are  not  only
      sensitive detectors of  gravitational  impulses,  but  also  of
      *electromagnetic* signals ranging from 50-500 GHz!  Hence, these
      circuits could be used to detect  many  types  of signals, including
      radar signals.
      To detect only  gravity  waves, and not EMI, the circuit  should  be
      shielded against all  electromagnetic  radiation.  Both circuits are
      low in cost and easy to build.  Assembly  is  non-critical, although
      proper wiring practices should be followed.
      Initially, you should  use the op-amps specified;  don't  experiment
      with other devices  until  you  attain satisfactory results with the
      devices called for.  Later you can experiment with other components,
      like low-power op-amps, especially  CMOS  types,  which  have diodes
      across their inputs to protect them against high input voltages.
      Those diodes make  them  much  less  sensitive  to  electromagnetic
      radiation, so circuits  that use those devices may be used to detect
      gravity-waves without shielding.
      The circuit in Fig. 4 is the QND or  ringing  type, but the feedback
      resistance is variable from 0.5 to 2 megohms.  That  allows  you  to
      tune the circuit to the natural oscillating frequency of different
      astrophysical events.
      Huge supernova bursts, for example, have much larger amplitudes, and
      much lower frequencies  of  oscillation  than  normal supernovas and
      novas.  Hence you can tune the detector for the supernova burst rate
      that interests you.  With the component values given in Fig.  4, the
      resonant frequency of the circuitcan  be  varied between 300-900 Hz.
      The circuit of Fig. 4, or a variant thereof, was used to obtain all
      the experimental data discussed below.
                                      Page 5
      In addition, the  circuits that we've described in this article were
      built in an aluminum chassis and then  located  within an additional
      steel box to  reduce  pickup  of  stray  EMI.  Power  and  output
      connections were made through filter-type feedthrough capacitors.
      In the QND  mode,  coupling  the  detector's  output  to  an  audio
      amplifier and an  oscilloscope  gives  impressive  sound  and  sight
      effects.
      Fluctuations generally reflect passing gravitational  shadows.  The
      author has taken  much  data  of  the  sort  to  be discussed; let's
      examine a few samples of that data  to  indicate the kind of results
      you can expect, and ways of interpreting those results.
      Sample scans
      ------------
      Shown in Fig.  5 is an unusual structure that was  repeated  exactly
      the next day,  but  four  minutes earlier.  The pattern was followed
      for several weeks, moving four minutes earlier per day.
      That confirms the  observation  that  the  burst  response  of  the
      detector was related to our location on earth with  respect  to  the
      rest of the  universe.    The  change  of  four  minutes  per  day
      corresponds with the relative movements  of  the  earth and the body
      that was casting the "shadow."
      The plot of Fig. 6 appears to be a supernova, probably  in  our  own
      galaxy, caught in the act of exploding.  The plot of Fig. 7 was made
      four days after  another supernova explosion; that plot reveals that
      that supernova left  a  well-developed  black  hole  and  "ring"
      structure.
      You may find it interesting to consider that visual  indications  of
      those supernovas will  not  be  seen for several thousand years!  As
      such, it might  be  "quite  a  while"  before  we  get  a  visual
      confirmation of our suspected supernova!
      Last, Fig. 8 shows a plot of the moon's gravitational  shadow during
      the eclipse of  May  30,  1984.  Note that the gravitational shadow
      preceded the optical shadow by about eight minutes!
      That gives credence  to  our  claim  that  gravitational  effects
      propagate instantaneously.  Relatedly, but not shown  here,  a  deep
      shadow is consistently  detected  whenever  the center of the galaxy
      appears on the meridian (180 degrees)  hinting of the existence of a
      "black hole" in that region.
      Conclusions
      -----------
      In this article we discussed the highlights of a new  theory  of the
      universe that predicts the existence of monopole gravity waves.  We
      then presented details  of  a  circuit  that  can  be used to detect
      monopole gravity waves.
      The author has monitored those signals for ten years so is confident
      that you will be able to duplicate  those results.  Needless to say,
      the subject of gravity waves is a largely unexplored  one, and there
      is much yet to be learned.
                                      Page 6
      Perhaps this article  will  inspire  you  to  contribute  to  that
      knowledge.  In your  experiments,  you  might  consider  trying  the
      following: Operate several detector circuits at the  same  time  and
      record the results.
      Separate the detectors  --  even  by  many  miles --and record their
      outputs.  In such experiments, the  author  found that the circuits'
      outputs were very similar.  Those results would seem  to  count  out
      local EMI or pure random noise as the cause of the circuit response.
      For more information  on  the  subject  of gravity you might consult
      _Gravitation_ by C. Misner, K. Thorne,  and J. Wheeler, published by
      W.H.  Freeman and  Co.,  1973.  Also,  the article,  "Quantum  Non-
      Demolition Measurements" in  _Science_,  Volume  209,  August 1 1980
      contains useful information on the  QND  type  of  measurement  used
      here.
      --------------------------------------------------------------------
      Sidebar: Rhysmonic Cosmology
      Ancient and Renaissance physicists postulated the  existence  of  an
      all-pervasive medium they  called  the _ether_.  Since the advent of
      sub-atomic physics and relativity, theories of the ether have fallen
      into disuse.
      Rhysmonic cosmology postulates the  existence of rhysmons, which are
      the fundamental particles of nature, and which pervade the universe,
      as does the ether.
      Each rhysmon has  the  attributes  of  size,  shape,  position,  and
      velocity; rhysmons are arranged in space in a matrix structure, the
      density of which varies according to position in the universe.
      The matrix structure  of  rhysmons  in  free space gives rise to the
      fundamental units of length, time,  velocity, mass, volume, density,
      and energy discovered by physicist Max Planck.
      Fundamental postulates of the Rhysmonic Universe can  be  summarized
      as follows:
              o The universe is finite and spherical
              o Euclidean  geometry  is  sufficient  to describe Rhysmonic
                Space.
              o The edge of the universe is a perfect reflector of energy.
              o Matter forms only in the central portion of the universe.
      The matrix structure  of  rhysmons    allows  the  instantaneous
      transmission of energy  along  a  straight  line, called  an  energy
      vector, from the  point of origin to the edge of the universe, where
      it would be reflected according  to  laws  similar  those  giverning
      spherical optics.
      In Rhysmonic Cosmology,  mass, inertia, and energy  are  treated  as
      they are in  classical  mechanics.  Mass  arises,  according to the
      author, because "particles in rhysmonic cosmology must be the result
      of changes in the `density' of the  rhysmonic  structure,  since the
      universe is nothing more than rhysmons and the void."
      In a "dense" area of the universe, such as the core of a particle, a
      number of rhysmons are squeezed togther.  This means that every
                                      Page 7
      particle has a    correlating  anti-particle,  or  an  area  of
      correspondingly low density.  In addition,  a particle has an excess
      of outward-directed energy  vectors,  and  an anti-particle  has  an
      excess of inward-directed energy vectors.  Those vectors are what we
      usually call electric charge.
      Gravity is not  a  force  of attraction between objects; rather, two
      objects are impelled towards each  other by energy vectors impinging
      on the surfaces of those objects that do not face each other.
      Netwon's laws of  gravitation  hold,  although their  derivation  is
      different than in Newton's system.
      Gravitational waves arise  in various ways, but, in general, a large
      astronomical disturbance, such as  the  explosion  of  a  supernova,
      instantaneously modulates the  rhysmonic  energy  vectors.    That
      modulation might then  appear,  for  example,  superimposed  on  the
      Earth's gravitaional-field flux --  and  it  would  be detectable by
      circuits like those described here.
      --------------------------------------------------------------------
      Diagrams
      --------
                                        Fig. 2  -  A  Basic  gravity-wave
                                        detector is very simple.  The
        - - - - )| - - - -- - - - -.    charge build-up on capacitor C1
        .    Cx 470pF            .    is due to gravity-wave impulses
        .                          .    amplified by IC1 for output.
        .                          .
        .                          .
        .    R1 1.3M              .        R2 see text
        o----v^v^v^----------------o  -----v^v^v^------------------O DC
        |                          |  |                            Output
        |            ^            |  |
        |          _  | +9V        |  |
        |        2| \_|7          |  |
        o---------|  \_          |  |
      _|_        |IC1  \_ 6      |  |    C2 see text
      ___ C1    | 741  _>--------o---o-----|(---------------------O Audio
        |  .22  3|    _/                                            Output
        o---------|  _/4
        |        |_/ |
        |            v -9V
        |
        |-----------------------------------------------------------O Gnd
                                      Page 8
                                                                      O   
            Output
            R1 500K    R2 1.5M          R5 100K                    |
        -----^v^v^v------^v^v^v--    |----^v^v^v----------------------o
        |                  ^  |    |                                |
        |                  |  |    |                                |
        |          _        |___|    |      _    ^ +9V              |
        |        2| \_          |    |    6| \_  |                  |
        o---------|  \_        |    o------|  \_|8                  |
      _|_C1      |IC1-a\_ 1    |    >R4    |IC1-b\_  7              |
      ___ .22    |1/2  _>-----o    >5K    |1/2  _>-----------------|
        |        3|1458_/      |    >    5|1458_/
        o---------|  _/      R3>    |  |---|  _/ |4
        |        |_/        10K><---|  |  |_/  |
        |                      >      |        v -9V
        |                      |      |
        |-----------------------o-------o-----------------------------O Gnd
      Fig. 4 -- A buffered output stage  makes  the  gravity-wave detector
                easier to use.
      Parts List - Simple Detector      Parts List - Buffered Detector
      All resistors 1/4-watt, 5%.        All fixed resistors 1/4-watt, 5%.
      R1 - 1.3 megohm                    R1 - 500,000 ohms
      R2 - see text                      R2 - 1.5 megohms, potentiometer
      Capacitors                        R3 - 10,000 ohms, potentiometer
      C1 - 0.22 uF                      R4 - 5000 ohms
      C2 - see text                      R5 - 100,000 ohms
      Cx - see text                      Capacitors
      Semiconductors                    C1 - 0.22 uF
      IC1 - 741 op-amp                  Semiconductors
                                          IC1 - 1458 dual op-amp
      --------------------------------------------------------------------
        If you have comments or other information relating  to such topics
        as  this  paper covers,  please  upload to KeelyNet or send to the
          Vangard  Sciences  address  as  listed  on the  first  page.
              Thank you for your consideration, interest and support.
          Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson
                            Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet

Print this item

  SIMPLE TIME-DISTORTION DETECTOR
Posted by: JoeLag - 09-19-2023, 10:03 PM - Forum: Electonic Projects & Schematics - No Replies

SIMPLE TIME-DISTORTION DETECTOR

Several inventions in the realm of alternative science have claimed to distort local space-time, affecting either the speed of light or the flow of time. Detecting these anomalies is nontrivial, but there are a few proposed methods. Optical distortions could be observed through the use of Schlieren or Foucault mirror test systems, while deflections in a laser beam can be identified using an "optical lever." However, these methods may not be sensitive enough to capture extremely subtle effects.

Here’s an alternative yet sensitive approach: Construct two crystal oscillators. Utilize one as a reference and the other as a probe. Beat their outputs together and monitor the difference frequency, either through instrumentation or even by ear. Place the reference oscillator at a significant distance and use the probe to examine the area around a device suspected to produce time anomalies. Any local changes in time would manifest as fluctuations in the beat frequency.

A rudimentary version of this apparatus using a CD4049 CMOS inverter and 32KHz digital watch crystals. I discovered that power supply coupling caused phase-locking between the oscillators, an issue mitigated by using independent power supplies and buffer stages.

Frequency synchronization can be achieved by altering the power supply voltage or adjusting the bias point of the CMOS inverter's input pin. Note that these crystals are temperature-sensitive, so temperature stabilization measures such as "crystal ovens" are advisable for a robust setup.

Subsequent experiments with 30MHz 5-volt oscillators revealed more stable behavior, although temperature compensation was still needed. Multiple display methods were explored, ranging from oscilloscopic visualizations to direct frequency measurements using commercial frequency counters.

Let's delve into the construction details.

Crystal Oscillators

Use a CD4049 CMOS inverter IC for each oscillator. This chip will form the heart of your oscillator.
Connect a 32KHz digital watch crystal between the input and output pins of one of the inverters in the CD4049. This forms a simple oscillator circuit.
Use a capacitor (say, 22pF) on either side of the crystal to ground to improve the stability.
Power the IC using an LM78L05 voltage regulator to give a stable 5V power supply. Use separate regulators for each oscillator to minimize interference.

Buffering and Isolation

To eliminate phase-lock between the oscillators, use a buffering stage, perhaps another inverter from the CD4049, connected to the output of the oscillator.
Use separate power supplies for each oscillator to minimize coupling. Isolate the ground lines as much as possible.

Frequency Synchronization

To fine-tune the oscillators, you can use LM317 adjustable regulators. Connect them to the VCC pin of the CD4049 and adjust the voltage to slightly alter the frequency.

Temperature Compensation

House each oscillator circuit, including the CD4049 IC and the crystal, inside a small metal can.
Add a PTC thermistor within each can. The thermistor will act as a rudimentary "oven," stabilizing the temperature.

Output Analysis

You can use a simple mixer circuit to combine the outputs and listen to the difference or "beat" frequency.
Alternatively, use an oscilloscope to visually monitor the oscillators. Trigger the oscilloscope with one oscillator and display the output of the other.

Optional Enhancements

For even better results, you may opt for 30MHz 5-volt oscillators that come in shielded cans. These oscillators usually include buffering and some power supply regulation internally.
As we tread these less-traveled paths of scientific exploration, let's not forget the minutiae. They may very well hold the key to unlocking the secrets we seek.

Print this item

  Experimental detection of the torsion field
Posted by: JoeLag - 09-19-2023, 09:52 PM - Forum: Files - No Replies

Experimental detection of the torsion field


.pdf   Experimental detection of the torsion field..pdf (Size: 1.87 MB / Downloads: 10)

Print this item

  Experimental investigation of new long-range actions
Posted by: JoeLag - 09-19-2023, 09:50 PM - Forum: Files - No Replies

Experimental investigation of new long-range actions


.pdf   Experimental investigation of new long-range actions.pdf (Size: 7 MB / Downloads: 2)

Print this item

  Gravity Wave Radio
Posted by: JoeLag - 09-19-2023, 09:47 PM - Forum: Electonic Projects & Schematics - Replies (3)

Gravity Wave Radio


.pdf   gravity wave radio.pdf (Size: 911.84 KB / Downloads: 64)

Print this item

  SCALAR ELECTROSTATIC GRADIOMETER
Posted by: JoeLag - 09-19-2023, 09:46 PM - Forum: Electonic Projects & Schematics - No Replies

SCALAR ELECTROSTATIC GRADIOMETER

   

PARTS:

  • 2 - TL082 dual JFET op amp (Tex. Inst)
  • 1 - .001uF 50V ceramic disk capacitor
  • 5 - .01uF 50V ceramic disk capacitor
  • 3 - 100pF 50V ceramic disk capacitor
  • 2 - 10uF 25V electrolytic capacitor
  • 1 - 2M ohm potentiometer (lin. taper)
  • 2 - 1M ohm potentiometer (aud. taper)
  • 1 - Diode 1N914, 1N4148, or similar
  • 1 - 100M ohm resistor (or five 22M in series)
  • 2 - 120uH RF choke coil
  • 1 - Ferrite toroid (T1, see text)
  • Resistors, 1/8W 5%
    • 2 - 1M
    • 2 - 47K
    • 2 - 10K
    • 4 - 6.2K
    • 1 - 3.0K
    • 1 - 1.5K
  • 1 - 5mA panel meter
  • 1 - 5mA panel meter, center zero (+-2.5mA meter.)
  • 1 - DPST power switch
  • 2 - Telescoping radio antenna
  • 3 - Knobs for pots
  • 1 - Silica gel dessicant bag (baked to dry it)
  • 1 - proto circ. board
  • 1 - Metal enclosure
 


 


The Scalar Electrostatic Gradiometer. Robert A. Shannon ,rshannon@nectech.com November 1995
The Scalar Electrostatic Gradiometer is a device which measures the interaction of environmental electrostatic fields and gradients with an artificially generated electrostatic field. This interaction is displayed on an analog meter, along with a separate electromagnetic field strength meter, so that the user may compare the relative activity of electromagnetic and electrostatic phenomena.
The user may control the polarity and magnitude of the artificially generated electrostatic field, which is used to sense environmental fields and phenomena by direct electrostatic field to field interference. By noting the response to changes in this reference field, a great deal of information about the environmental fields may be deduced. Normal electromagnetic phenomena are indicated separately, to clarify the nature of the electrostatic effects.
By mapping non-linearities in the ambient environmental electrostatic fields, an area may be scanned for "congruences" of bioelectric and exotic fields, and anticipate probable sites for future activity as well as locations of present or past events.
This surprisingly simple device has proven to be highly sensitive and accurate. By noting environmental non-linearities in the electrostatic field interactions, a broad range of formerly subjective phenomena now becomes hard, cold, objective data. New patterns of interaction between environmental field sources can shed some light on the nature of these phenomena.
This device is suitable for the study of an enormous range of subjects, such as: investigations into Paranormal phenomena of all types, geomantic and divination studies, study of standing wave phenomena, both electromagnetic and scalar, and the detection and mapping of telluric currents.
In a short time, users with no technical understanding of the device are able to detect and collect useful data in practical studies.
Notes on Component Selection:
By convention the electromagnetic field strength meter is a standard meter movement, while the electrostatic meter uses a zero centered meter that deflects right for positive and left for negative currents. Full sized meters in the 0 to 5 milliamp (-2.5 to 0 to +2.5 ma. for the electrostatic meter) range are recommended. The meters selected should be rugged, and have easily readable faces and good mechanical damping. Use the highest quality meters available, as the nature of the meters' actions convey a great deal of information in most situations.
It is possible to use a normal meter movement for both sections without circuit modifications other than selecting the correct value for the series resistor. The value of the current limiting resistors in series with each meter must be selected so that full range deflection occurs one to two volts below the positive supply voltage.
If you prefer to use a LED or LCD bar graph type display, substantial circuit modifications will be needed to prevent false readings induced by power line frequencies. These have no effect on the mechanical meter movements in the circuit as presented. Several stages of active filtering may be needed.
Digital displays should not be used, as the trend of the meter reading is often important. This is an analog device in nature, and should remain so. If computerization is mandatory, a graphical display should be used.
 
Construction:
Assemble the circuit according the schematic diagram. Use proper component layout techniques to minimize stray capacitance. To minimize microphonics, use either "pad per hole" copper clad breadboard, or fabricate a printed circuit board. Pay close attention to grounding. As the circuit is quite simple, the board may be mounted directly to the connections on the rear of the meters, using the electrical connections as the mechanical mounting for the circuit board as well.
The Gradiometer MUST be built in a metal box to prevent the user's body capacitance from severely limiting the sensitivity and performance of the unit. All connections for the three sense antennae should use BNC or similar connectors.
By convention, the two meters are placed side by side, with the RF sniffer on the left, and the "Delta Es" or electrostatic meter on the right. The sensitivity control for the sniffer should be located on the left, under the meter or on the left hand side of the unit. The sensitivity and bias controls for the electrostatic meter circuit are placed under or beside the meter on the right hand side of the unit. The two electrostatic antennae connect on the top side of the enclosure.
The antennae themselves should be simple straight antennae. Telescoping sections may be used, so that the operator may control the field interaction area. The electrostatic antennae should be parallel, or slightly divergent. The RF sniffer antenna may take any reasonable form, but should not intrude between the electrostatic antennae.
To wind L1, select a small toroid core with high reactance at lower frequencies. Twist a foot or so of small diameter insulated wire, and then wind this twisted pair onto the core in the normal manner for a toroidal coil. Use two different colors of insulated wire, and make sure the correct connections and phasing are used.
If you cannot locate a 100 megohm resistor, use a small number of the largest value resistors available. This resistor provides a path to ground for excess charge deposited onto the collector antenna by electrostatic field interaction and greatly enhances the stability of the device. The exact value is not critical, but it should be as high as practical.
The "gimmick" is a short length of the same twisted pair as is used in L1. This forms a small value capacitor to stabilize the electrostatic meter amplifier. Start with five inches or so. This will be trimmed in the checkout and calibration section. Do not substitute a variable capacitor here, use the old fashioned "gimmick" from the old days of radio.
As always, verify that there are no wiring errors, check that all grounding points and connections are of good quality.
 
Checkout and Calibration:
With the unit fully assembled, and fresh batteries in place, verify by moving the bias control that the "Delta Es"`meter will move throughout its full range. If the meter will not deflect evenly in both directions, check that both batteries are in good condition and that the bias potentiometer is working correctly, and does not have any non-linearities or other problems.
Check that the sensitivity control also works well. If the electrostatic meter "pegs and sticks" easily, and cannot be brought back by changing the bias control alone, trim a few millimeters of the "gimmick" device, and repeat the testing. This must be dome by trial and error. Be comfortable with the operation of the device before each interaction of the trimming and testing process. If you have trimmed too far, tighten the twisted pair just a bit.
Verify that the RF sniffer section and its sensitivity control also work correctly. Use a radio source such as a small wireless mike or garage door opener for testing. The RF sniffer should be able to detect low powered RF signal sources at a good range, and CB transmitters many tens of yards away. Background electromagnetic radiation levels should be easily visible at the highest sensitivity settings. This value should be noted first in each field survey or measurement.
Note the effect of RF transmissions on both meters. There should be only a small electrostatic effect unless standing waves are present.
If you travel with the device, it may be wise to make allowances to alter the gain of the sniffer amplifier stage itself. Ambient RF levels vary over a wide range; make sure that this background level may be measured in "quiet" areas. At full sensitivity, there should always be a reading on this meter.
Local effects which produce a lowering of this background level and anomalous electrostatic effects deserve special attention, as do higher than usual EM signal areas, with and without electrostatic anomalies.
The combination of such EM nulls with electrostatic-effect anomalies, along with localized endothermic effects (such as cold spots, or high heat loss zones) confirms "exotic" phenomena.
If the device is built in a humid environment, allow the unit to stabilize in an air conditioned area before calibration of the gimmick. Seal the unit well and include a small packet of dessicant inside the unit, secured so that it will not move about. New England winters are ideal times for gradiometer calibration.
 
Theory of Operation:
The electrostatic section consists of a differential electrometer and an associated electrostatic field source designed to have high rejection of RF and ambient electromagnetic signals. The high gain configuration limits the frequency response to a few Hertz only.
The bias control presents a DC voltage to C3, and the electrostatic leakage through this capacitor charges the emitter antenna until C3 has reached equalibrium. RFC1 prevents ambient RF from entering the power supply. The two capacitors shown on the bias potentiometer should be physically on the bias control itself to minimize lead length.
L1 and its associated capacitors form a pi network RF filter. The bifilar winding of L1 helps common mode RF signal rejection, and enhances the electrostatic field interaction.
IC-1 forms a differential electrometer, and produces an output in proportion to the electrostatic differential between the antennae. This first stage is kept stable by the electrostatic "gimmick". The second stage of IC-1 forms a simple meter driver and integrator.
The RF sniffer is conventional in its operation. A simple detector drives an amplifier stage. The 1 megohm resistor from output to inverting input may be changed to alter the gain. If the ambient RF levels in your area are low, you may wish to raise the value of this resistor to increase the maximum sensitivity of the RF sniffer section.
 
Operation and Use:
Once you have completed and calibrated your gradiometer, spend some time familiarizing yourself with its operation and behavior. In a dry environment try moving different types of plastics around the antenna area and note the reaction. Try this with differing amounts and polarities of charge on the emitter element by adjusting the bias control and watching the meter.
Watch how fast the electrostatic meter reacts to changes in the bias control, note any differance, or preferance to one polatiry or the other. Watch the reaction of the meters as you move along the electorstatic gradients. Be aware that large concentrations of ions will also be detected.
Try placing insulators with large free electrostatic fields some distance from the unit, and move the unit around the bit of plastic. Repeat this with a conducting electrostatic shield near the plastic object, and note how the electrostatic "shield" effects the readings.
Once familiar with your gradiometer, take it out for a walk. Note how objects effect the electrostatic field locally, and note any patterns of interaction. Pay attention to areas with higher than ambient RF fields, as there may be electromagnetic standing waves present with associated electrostatic fields.
If possible, take your new gradiometer to a site with known "exotic" phenomena activity. You will find that the gradiometer is quite sensitive to a wide range of effects. If at times the gradiometer appears to be suffering from some form of external interference, not electromagnetic in nature, shut the unit off for a few minutes. Shorting the electrostatic antenna briefly may also help. Wait a few calm minutes, and then resume your measurements. If this becomes common in a specific location, check for the presence of any ionizing radiations.
This gradiometer design has been used sucessfully in measurements of neolithic sites. It detected faulty reconstruction at the site, as well as standing stones not shown on maps of the site, and the original locations of stones which had moved due to frost-thaw cycles. Measurements of anomalous electrostatic fields associated with quartz crystals which had been "charged" by shamantic processes have been made. Areas reported to have experienced paranormal phenomena, also verified by "sensitives", have been independently found and measured by gradiometer survey.
In more than one case, hidden objects were found by use of a gradiometer. The person who owned and hid the objects was present during the test, and as the operator moved closer to the hidden objects, the owner of the objects would experience some anxiety. Electrostatic anomalies would then be manifest around the objects, givng away their position. There was no way for the owner of the hidden objects to cue the gradiometer operator.
If in doubt, try it yourself. Objective experience expands the mind.
Objects that had been "protected" from detection by alleged psychic means were also easily detectable without the hider being present. This should be tested with lost objects as well!
I hope this starts a few lines of inquiry into any of the many apparently different types of reported exotic phenomena. The general utility of this device might suggest that these apparently different phenomena may actually all be quite closely related. This simple device allows us to open the door to a much larger world.
I look forward to hearing of your adventures with this device. For years I've wanted to see what readngs might be collected from a "genuine" crop circle, as well as several other such subjects.



MAIL, NOTES FROM BILL B., 7/2001  
Quote:WARNING: IC1 IS EASILY DESTROYED BY 'STATIC'This instrument can easily be wrecked by electrostatic voltages. If you build up static body potenitals on a dry day, then "zap" either of the antennas, you'll kill IC1. To greatly reduce this possibility, build the whole device into a metal case. That way the body of the person holding the instrument will not be able to deliver huge voltages to the antennas. Just avoid bumping the antennas against large metal objects and other people. And buy some extra op-amp chips so you have replacements for IC1 when it gets zapped. Bob Shannon's Gradiometer differs from this one-transistor FET detector in that it measures the strength of LOCAL FIELD DIRECTION of environmental voltage, rather than directly measuring the environmental voltages (relative to ground.) One large benefit is that the Gradiometer should mostly ignore the charge of the human being holding the device. For example, the simple charge detector goes crazy if you walk across a carpet with rubber-soled shoes. The gradiometer instead measures the difference in the voltage picked up by the two antennae, and unless the input is overloaded, this difference would not change enormously as you touch your shoes to the carpet.CENTER-READING METERIf you can't find a +- meter, some kinds of 5mA meters can be modified to move the needle to the center position. If the usual adjusting screw won't go far enough, then remove the plastic cover plate and carefully turn the adjustment by hand. Then simply make a paper meter scale label and glue it in place.TL082 OP AMP, VERSUS TL072While it is always a bad idea to alter a "weird science" device, you might wish to try using TL072 op amps instead of the one used above. TL072 were sold in later years, and create less circuit noise than TL082. Try both, and if TL072 does not improve things, stick with the original parts list.MIGHT DRIFT AND LOSE GAIN ON HUMID DAYSNote that the whole circuit around pins 2 and 3 of IC1 is dealing with thousand-megohm resistances. For this reason, surface leakage of all components becomes significant, and the gain may go way down during high humidity. Provide an airtight enclosure for the instrument so the bag of silica gel dessicant won't fill up with water and stop working.If you make a printed circuit board for the gradiometer, it might be best to NOT make any traces for the conductors attached to pins 2 and 3 of IC1, or the conductors attached to the two antennas. Instead, solder the terminals of these components directly to each other, so the wires are hanging in space and aren't touching the moist surface of the PCB. This includes the terminals of RFC1, T1, and one lead each of C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, and R2. You might even want to bend pins 2 and 3 of IC1 up into the air, and solder wires directly to them, rather than letting them touch the conductive plastic of a proto board or an IC socket. It might even be wise to paint the plastic case of IC1 with red GLPT high-voltage paint (corona dope), to limit the surface leakage across the IC1 plastic package, ESPECIALLY any surface leakage between the -9v on pin 4 and the adjacent pin 3. If humidity is high and meter M1 seems to constantly drift negative, it probably is caused by surface leakage between pin 4 and 3 of IC1.T1 BIFILAR CHOKET1 and the four surrounding capacitors appear to form a "common mode" filter which rejects high frequency (such as radio signals and the continuing electrical noise from nearby power lines caused by light dimmers and motor brush sparks.) Any small toroid core should work, although a larger core would give larger inductance and better filtering."GIMMICK" TWISTED PAIRThe "gimmick" probably functions as a resistor. Note that the first section of IC-1 is wired as a conventional op-amp differential amplifier, but it lacks a feedback resistor. If we wanted to make it be a high-gain DC amp, we'd need a 10,000 megohm resistor across pins 1 and 2, in order to form a 100x divider network with the 100 megohm resistor R2. The tiny conductance of the plastic of the twisted-pair 'gimmick' (as well as the conductance of surface leakage across that plastic) probably forms an ultra-high-value resistor. The capacitance of the 'gimmick' probably forms a capacitive divider with C7, which prevents overload by signals at frequencies too high for the meter needle to respond.Note that there is no resistor anywhere connected to pin 3 of IC1. Pin 3 is electrically "floating," except for the ultra-high resistance of capaictors C3, C4, and C5. These capacitors probably provide an invisible voltage divider (just assume they act as resistors with values much higher than 1000 megohms.) If these capacitors were perfect insulators, the output of the op amp would drift all over the place and would not respond to the R1 "bias" control. If your meter DOES drift uncontrollably, try swapping out C3 with other types of .001uF capacitor until you find one with the right kind of internal leakage. Or, if you can locate a 10,000Megohm resistor, wire it across C3.  


Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:19:51 -0700 (PDT)From: William Beaty <[Image: abcg.gif]>To: Freenrg-L <freenrg-l@eskimo.com>Subject: Re: [FG]: Gradiometer againC. Ford mentioned one problem with battery power: meter drift is caused by the way the R1 "bias" pot is connected. Since the gain of the electrostatic section is probably over 100x, then whenever the voltage of the 9v batteries drift, the meter needle will wander rapidly. To stop this, rather than feeding +-9v to the legs of R1, we should feed them regulated power. To make a simple 6.2v voltage regulator, connect a 6.2v zener across the load being regulated, then put a resistor in series with the incoming supply. On the above schematic, we'd connect a 100K resistor in series with each leg of pot R1, then use two 6.2v zener diodes (number 1N4735A), connecting each zener to ground and to one leg of R1, with diode polarity chosen for correct operation.LOL! Brainstorm!If we aren't dead certain about how this device really works, maybe we shouldn't change it. What if the most interesting readings are ACTUALLY USING THE 9V BATTERIES AS AN ANTENNA?!! If some "weird physics" signals are slightly altering the output voltage of the 9v batteries, then this device is actually a "differential detector" where simultaneous changes of battery voltages are ignored, but if one battery voltage goes up while the other goes down, the meter needle strongly responds. Smile Don't forget, the voltage of a battery comes right from quantum mechanics; right from the microscopic layer of aligned electrolyte molecules which coats the battery electrodes. In that case, we could get rid of the antennas, and instead improve the sensitivity by putting each 9v battery on the end of a long rod!If anyone here has already built this device, try adding zeners to make regulated +-6volts, then add a DPDT switch that lets you connect R1 either directly to the batteries, or to regulated 6V. Then, when using the device, see if the voltage regulation makes it behave better. Or see if the voltage regulation REMOVES the interesting signals.

Print this item

  Tesla's Radiations and Kelvin's Ring Vortices
Posted by: JoeLag - 09-19-2023, 09:41 PM - Forum: Files - No Replies

Tesla's Radiations and Kelvin's Ring Vortices

PDF File 


.pdf   Meyl - Teslas Radiations und Kelvins Ringwirbel aus Sicht der modernen Neutrinoforschung.pdf (Size: 777.41 KB / Downloads: 38)

Print this item

  Underground Radio
Posted by: JoeLag - 09-19-2023, 09:39 PM - Forum: Radio & RF - No Replies

Underground Radio

PDF File


.pdf   UNDERGROUND RADIO.pdf (Size: 680.34 KB / Downloads: 38)

Print this item