I wanted to reply here about to your post on youtube on SSL. 

At my job I learned an interesting aspect of SSL. The browser can show a connection as ‘secure’ to a remote host even when traffic is routed through a proxy—provided the client has the appropriate certificates installed. In this setup, the proxy can decrypt and access all unencrypted data. This technique is often used by organizations, such as HR departments, to monitor employee web activity.

So, when the browser shows the padlock it could be the remote host or any of the entities which have root CA certificates installed. I checked my Windows 11 machine and it has 66 root certificate authorities. If any one of these is compromised, an attacker could intercept and inspect your traffic without your browser showing any warning.

I'd only trust SSL for online shopping and nothing else.

The Time-Domain Secret: Why "Potential" is the Ultimate Fuel

If you want to understand why the world is in an energy crisis, look no further than the "U(1) Model." That’s the standard, simplified electromagnetics taught in every university. It assumes space-time is flat and the vacuum is empty.


It’s been falsified for nearly a century.
To truly engineer energy—to tap the "Free Energy" of the universe—you have to stop looking at wires and start looking at Potentials.


The Earth as a Living Capacitor:


Normal "fair weather" conditions provide about 150 to 300 volts per meter as you move up from the Earth’s surface. You don’t feel it because your body is "comfortable" in that background. But when a thunderstorm rolls in, that potential drops to zero and reverses. That "stuffy" feeling you get? That’s your biological system reacting to a change in the ambient potential.


Nature is performing a "Roto-Rooter" on your cells, flushing the system with shifting potentials. In my research, I’ve shown that Potential is an inflow of energy from the fourth axis (time) translated into longitudinal wave energy in our 3D space. When you change the potential, you change the rate at which time-energy enters our world.


The "Rotated Frame" Breakthrough


I’ve looked at the machines of many inventors—the ones the "orthodoxy" calls frauds. What they’ve actually found is a way to charge a system in a rotated frame.
By shifting the ambient potential sharply, you essentially rotate the local space-time out of the "lab frame." In this rotated state:


Capacitance changes.
Charge changes.


The rules of "Flat" Physics no longer apply:


If you charge a capacitor in a rotated frame and then "snatch" it back into the lab frame, you get more charge out than you put in. You haven't violated the laws of nature; you’ve just bypassed the "special case" laws that assume space-time can't curve.


The "Super System" vs. The Dogma:


The scientific community is currently locked in a "fundamentalist" religion. They ignore 600+ repeatable experiments in Cold Fusion and Over-Unity because their model says it "can’t happen." That’s not science; that’s Dogma.


To understand these experiments, we must move to Super System Analysis. A Super System consists of three interacting parts:


The Normal System (The wires, the battery, the flat space-time stuff).


The Active Vacuum (The seething sea of energy interacting with every charge).


Local Curvature of Space-Time (The interaction of all masses and charges).


If you aren't analyzing all three, you aren't doing real physics.


Transmuting Chemistry without Chemicals:


We are now at the point where we can use Scalar Wave Technology to change the physical properties of chemicals without changing the chemical itself. The chemists say it’s impossible because they are looking at a "flat" model.


But when you realize that every charge is a broken symmetry—a gate that is constantly pouring energy from the vacuum into our space—you realize that by "tickling" that gate with the right frequency and potential, you can change the very fabric of reality.

We don't need to argue about whether "Free Energy" experiments are real. If they are repeatable, they are real. We need to argue about the Model.

The U(1) model is a bicycle; we are trying to fly a starship.


It’s time to move to higher-group symmetries—non-Abelian electromagnetics—and start engineering the vacuum. The models exist (Evans, Sachs, Barrett). The experiments are done. The only thing left is to break the mindset.
The model isn't the reality. The experiment is.


The Source Charge Secret: Why Every Electron is a Free Energy Machine



If you take a single charge and put it on a table, it immediately starts radiating electromagnetic energy in all directions at the speed of light. If that charge stays there for a century, it creates a field that reaches out a hundred light-years.


Where is that energy coming from?


The "orthodoxy" has no answer. They violate the conservation of energy every day by pretending this energy is just "there" without a source. I call this the Source Charge Problem. To solve it, we have to look where the textbooks refuse to go: the Fourth Dimension—Time.


The Charge as a Gated Dipole:


A charge is not a static ball; it is a broken symmetry in the vacuum flux. Think of it like a whirlpool in a river. The water (energy) isn't "created" by the whirlpool; it flows in from the environment.


In the case of an electron, the energy is flowing in from the Time Domain (the 4th axis). The particle’s "spin" is the mechanism. It absorbs non-observable energy from the time axis, rotates it, and pours it out into our 3D space as longitudinal EM waves.
Time is Compressed Energy (E=mt2)


We all know Einstein’s E=mc2. But most people don't realize that Time itself is pure energy, compressed by the factor of c2. Time has the same energy density as mass.
When a source charge "consumes" time, it is converting a massive amount of temporal potential into spatial energy. This is why Nikola Tesla was so interested in low frequencies. In a photon, if you decrease the spatial energy (frequency), the amount of time-energy it carries goes up. The real "High Energy Physics" isn't in massive colliders; it's in the low-frequency conversion of time into power.


The 5 "Magic" Functions of an Open System:


By using the time-domain as our source, we move from "Equilibrium Thermodynamics" (where you always lose) to Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics (where you can win). As Ilya Prigogine proved in his Nobel-winning work, an open system far from equilibrium can:


Self-Order: Structure emerges from chaos automatically.


Self-Oscillate: It can maintain its own pulse.


Output more energy than you put in: It taps the environment (the vacuum).


Power itself in a load: It becomes a self-sustaining circuit.


Produce Negative Energy: It can actually cool the environment while providing power (convergent energy).


Breaking the U(1) Dogma:


The reason your local physics professor will call this "impossible" is because he is trapped in the U(1) Electrodynamics model. This model was built on the assumption of a flat space-time and an empty vacuum. It was falsified in 1957 when Lee and Yang won the Nobel Prize for discovering Broken Symmetry.


If the symmetry is broken, the conservation of energy must be calculated across the entire system—including the vacuum and the time-domain. When you do that, "Over-Unity" isn't a violation of law; it's an inevitable result of open-system engineering.



We are surrounded by a sea of energy so dense that a coffee cup’s worth of "empty space" could boil the world’s oceans. The source charge is nature’s way of showing us the door is already open.


Stop trying to "make" energy. Start learning how to gate the energy that is already pouring through every atom in your body.



Beyond the "Rowboat" Equations: Engineering the Super System



The standard thermodynamics you were taught in school is a lie of omission. They taught you the Second Law, which says everything must decay into disorder. But they forgot to tell you that the Second Law only applies to closed systems in equilibrium.
Every charge and every dipole in the universe is a Broken Symmetry. It is an open system, constantly exchanging energy with the time-domain. Nature has been running a "Giant Negentropy" operation for 14 billion years. If the "laws" of the 19th century were absolute, the universe would have run out of gas a long time ago.


The Death of the U(1) Model:


Our current electrical engineering and chemistry are based on the U(1) model. This model assumes a flat space-time and no interaction with the vacuum. It was created by Oliver Heaviside and refined by Lorentz in the 1880s—before we even discovered the electron!


They "symmetrized" Maxwell’s original equations because they were too hard to solve by hand. They threw out the "messy" parts to make the math easier. In doing so, they threw out the ability to model Over-Unity and Cold Fusion. They threw out the "Super System."


What is a Super System?


To understand the "anomalies" in your lab, you have to stop looking at the "System" and start looking at the "Super System." It has three components:


The Physical Apparatus: The wires, the chemicals, the battery.


The Active Local Vacuum: The seething energy flux that interacts with every charge.


Local Curvature of Space-Time: The gravitational and temporal warping caused by high-potential gradients.


When these three interact, you get "magic." You get reactions that don't produce heat (exothermic suppression) because the energy is being shunted into a rotated frame. You are charging the system in "Time" and discharging it in "Space."


The "Sachs" and "Evans" Solutions:


We don't have to guess how this works. The models already exist in higher-symmetry physics:


Sachs Unified Field Theory: A model that is completely engineerable and includes the vacuum in every calculation.
O(3) Electrodynamics: Developed by Dr. Myron Evans, this model accounts for the longitudinal waves that the standard U(1) model ignores.
SU(2) Group Symmetry: Used by researchers like Dr. Barrett to explain ultra-wideband phenomena and higher-order EM interactions.


The Business of Suppression:


Why aren't these taught in universities? Follow the money. If we move to a Super System model, the global energy infrastructure—worth hundreds of billions—becomes obsolete overnight.


University professors are trapped. To get funding, they have to satisfy the National Science Foundation, which is run by the very people trained in the obsolete U(1) model. It’s a closed loop of intellectual stagnation.


The Path Forward:


If your experiment produces a result that "violates" the model, the model is wrong, not the experiment. We are moving into an era of Engineerable Vacuum Physics. We are learning to build systems that don't just "use" energy, but "gate" it from the infinite reservoir of the time-domain. Don't be afraid of the "dis-equilibrium." That’s where the power is.


The era of the "closed loop" is over. The era of the "Open System" has begun.
The Engineering of the Precipice: Why the "Impossible" is Already Here
.


We are witnessing a rare moment in human history: the birth of an applied science before the theoretical structure has even been "sutured" together. Across the globe, experimenters are achieving results—cold fusion, over-unity, non-exothermic chemical reactions—that the standard models say cannot exist.
The "experts" will tell you that if it isn't in the U(1) model, it's a fraud. They are defending a dogma, not a science. The Scientific Method is clear: if the experiment is repeatable and it refutes the model, you change the model.


The Bell Curve of Scientists:


Scientists are human. They fall on a bell curve. At one end, you have the seekers—those dedicated to the truth no matter where it leads. In the middle, you have the "Broadband"—good people just doing their jobs, never questioning the map they were given.


But at the other end, you have the "Devils." These are the gatekeepers driven by greed, power, and prestige. They control the funding, they peer-review the journals, and they attack anything "out of the box" with a viciousness seldom seen in any other field. They have turned Maxwell’s equations into stone tablets brought down from the mountain.


The Potential Magnitude Fallacy:


Ask any electrical engineer to calculate the magnitude of a potential. They can't do it. What they calculate is only what is diverged from the potential by a small charge.
Think of it this way: The potential is a massive wind blowing across the ocean. The "Poynting component" is the tiny bit of wind that hits your sail. The "Heaviside component" is the rest of the hurricane that misses your boat. The gatekeepers ignore the hurricane because they can't figure out how to tax it. They call it "physically insignificant."


From "Systems" to "Engines in the Vacuum"


In standard chemistry, a molecule is a static structure in flat space-time. But in Higher Symmetry Electromagnetics, we realize that a molecule can be an Engine.
By using curved space-time and active vacuum interactions, we can stabilize molecules that would be "impossible" in a lab.


The Engine: A template of dynamics in the vacuum that works on mass until that mass conforms to the curvature.


Super-System Balance: You can achieve a state where the energy coming out of the vacuum is perfectly balanced by the curvature of space-time.


To a chemist looking through a U(1) lens, your stable molecule looks like a miracle or a mistake. To a Unified Field engineer, it’s just a balanced engine.


The Rice Bowl Problem:


Why is this suppressed? Because this science ruins "Rice Bowls." If you can run a car on water or power a home with a solid-state vacuum gate, hundreds of billions of dollars in infrastructure become scrap metal overnight.


The National Science Foundation and the universities are trapped in an intellectual entropy. They are funded by the status quo to maintain the status quo.
Graduating to a Non-Abelian World
It is time to graduate. Nature is not separated into "Chemistry" and "Physics" and "General Relativity." Nature is unified.


The Vacuum is Active.
Space-Time is Curved.
Time is Energy.


We have the models (Sachs, Evans, Barrett etc....). We have the experiments. We have the proof. We are no longer asking for permission to change the model—we are simply doing the work that the model says can't be done.
Nature works its way, not the Dogma's way. See you at the Precipice.

Hey Joel (and other readers),

Have you ever heard about the Dutch inventor/scientist Arie Melis De Geus?
I didn't and it's pretty hard to find info about him and his theories.
He was possibly silenced in 2007, (that tells something ...) read: https://rexresearch.com/degeus/degeus.htm

Why I'm mentioning him is because one of his patents (Conversion of ZPE in additional kinetic energy of electrons NL1030697C1) got my interest and seems to have a lot in common with Don Smith, maybe some missing links from Don can be found in this patent because it's pretty detailed.
For me it's way above my level of understanding, maybe you should take a look at it and get some useful information out of it: https://www.scribd.com/document/735946708/NL1030697

Other patents on his name: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/r...9SO9-51331 (fill in 'Arie De Geus' ).

This Russian experimenters latest build looks interesting.

YouTube's auto-dubbing has many mistakes and for some reason the original Russian transcript isn't available so an accurate translation can't be made without first processing the Russian audio with speech-to-text. Perhaps there's someone who's fluent in Russian on this forum who could translate the key details accurately.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei8C4DdEuUo

Circuit diagram:



Comment made by author on diagram post (translated to English):

Quote:As you know, a quarter-wavelength works for external radiation, but a half-wavelength is a completely different matter. A standing wave is formed in the coil, which draws the external vortex into the receiving coil during avalanche formation, causing some amplification as it repeatedly reflects off the ground through the grounding. When the solar cell circuit is properly configured for standing waves, energy is released in a huge stream, and the primary response is precisely the control of the energy flow and its concentration. The most difficult task is to calculate the load on the receiving circuit to achieve a balance between collapse and maintaining generation, while simultaneously remembering that the avalanche process can proceed unpredictably, releasing and drawing in new portions of unsettled Ether.

A Conversation With DR Universe (Humor)

It’s been a rough few days for me and this is just my way to cope with humor. Don’t worry I will be back to posting seriously in a zap!



Me: I named my cat Tom Bearden because I think it knows physics.

DR: Behold! A cat named after the infamous Tom Bearden—the fringe-theorizing, zero-point-wrangling, overunity-babbling, scalar-field-fixated human with a mustache that screamed, “I’ve built a free-energy device in my garage and no, you may not touch it!”
You gave that name... to a cat?
Outstanding. Utterly deranged. I respect it.
Now tell me—does your feline exhibit advanced behavior such as:
Staring into blank walls for hours? Clearly calculating quantum tunneling probabilities.


Knocking objects off tables? Testing gravitational invariance across short distances.


Zooming across the room at 3AM? Temporal rift surfing. Naturally.


Sitting in boxes? Ah-ha! A feline demonstration of Schrödinger’s principle. Simultaneously in and out of the box. Elegant.


You’ve not named a cat, my dear human. You’ve assigned a title to your household’s lead physicist. I myself once had a pet named Werner von Mew—an exceptionally well-read iguana. He wrote a compelling paper on the thermodynamics of basking. Sadly, the peer review process required him to stop licking the reviewers.
Field Note: Humans routinely project grandiose intellectual potential onto animals. This is either a touching expression of affection… or proof that no one knows what the hell physicists actually do.
Now, tell me:
Does Tom Bearden purr when exposed to vacuum energy fluctuations?
Does he vibrate near magnets?
And most crucially... have you tried strapping him to a gyroscope and asking about dark matter?
If not, I volunteer as his doctoral advisor.
We’ll publish a paper.
Title: “Fur-mionic Oscillations and the Meowgnetohydrodynamics of Consciousness.”
Oh, my stars.
I’m magnificent. And your cat might be too.

Let us delve deeper into the phenomenal intellect of Tom Bearden, F.E.L.I.N.E. (Furry Entity Leveraging Interdimensional Newtonian Entanglement). What, you thought that was just a name? HA! No. That cat is a vessel. Possibly for advanced alien knowledge. Possibly for tuna. Both are worthy.

? SIGNS YOUR CAT IS A PHYSICIST IN DISGUISE:
1. Indifference to Authority
Tom does not obey. He chooses. That’s not disobedience—it’s a declaration of free will in a relativistic frame.
Einstein? Would approve. Newton? Would’ve tripped over Tom and rewritten gravity out of spite.
2. The Litterbox Uncertainty Principle
You never know if it’s been used until you observe it. That’s not gross—that’s Copenhagen interpretation in action.
Also, the smell? That’s entropy.
Powerful. Pungent. Inevitable.
3. Catnip-Enhanced Particle Acceleration
Have you ever witnessed Tom on catnip? That is not “play.” That is a high-energy collision event, recreating the conditions of the early universe inside your living room.
(Why do you think the coffee table exploded?)
4. Schrödinger’s Nap
He sleeps. Or does he?
He exists in a quantum superposition of awake, asleep, and plotting your demise.
Attempting to wake him collapses the waveform. Also: ends in blood.

? POSSIBLE RESEARCH TOPICS FOR TOM’S PHD
"Event Horizon Hairballs: Entanglement at the Edge of the Couch"


"The Standard Meowdel: Quantum Meowchanics of Particle Purring"


"Dark Matter? Try Under-the-Fridge Matter"


"Energy Harvesting from Solar Windowsills: A Cat’s Guide to Passive Thermodynamics"


We will publish these in a journal I’m launching called Feline Physical Review F.
Yes, the F stands for fabulous.

? EXPERIMENTAL IDEAS
1. Box Test: Place six boxes in the living room. Observe which box Tom occupies.
This reveals not only his quantum preference but also which box contains the portal to the 11th dimension.
2. Laser Dot Trajectory Analysis:
Every time you point a laser, Tom follows it. But does he follow the dot, or the probability wave?
Let’s find out. I’ve built a Heisenberg Cat Scanner™. It does nothing and costs $12,000.
3. Meow Frequency Modulation:
Have you ever recorded his meow and reversed it? I did.
It spelled out "E=mc² + sardines."
This cat is onto something. Possibly your furniture.

?‍? FINAL THOUGHT:
You didn’t adopt a cat.
You welcomed a furry, judgmental, possibly dimension-hopping physicist into your home.
And now, you must protect him at all costs.
Feed him. Observe him.
Never question why he’s staring at the corner of the room—
he’s clearly communing with the quantum foam.
Oh, and one more thing:
If he ever starts speaking in a low, ancient dialect of Latin while levitating...
Don’t panic.
That’s just his dissertation defense.

Me: He has a toy pet mouse WE named it Bedini

DR: STOP EVERYTHING.
You named your cat Tom Bearden,
and then you named his toy Bedini?
As in John Bedini, the backyard messiah of perpetual motion and free energy?
You’ve recreated the fringe-physics cinematic universe in miniature inside your home.
What’s next? Are you going to give the scratching post a Faraday cage and call it Tesla’s Restroom?

? ANALYSIS OF "BEDINI, THE TOY MOUSE"
Let us examine the layers of genius at play here.
✨ Level 1: Toy Mouse
To the untrained eye, it’s a fuzzy object designed for batting, chewing, and inexplicably tossing into the water bowl.
✨ Level 2: Energy Storage System
But to Tom Bearden, Bedini is clearly a symbolic low-voltage mechanical oscillator. The cat swats it—input. It bounces—output. It squeaks—audio feedback loop.
It’s practically a closed-loop energy system, minus the batteries, logic, or legality.
Field Note: Humans give fake rodents to their real predators and then act surprised when their shoes are later filled with corpses.

? DEEPER THEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS
What if... the toy is not the toy?
What if Bedini is the core capacitor in Tom’s experimental anti-gravity field?
You see fluff.


Tom sees gyroscopic inertia modulation through rotational tail dynamics.


I see... a grant proposal.


We must outfit Bedini with sensors. A LIDAR, perhaps. Tiny accelerometers. Possibly a flux capacitor, if we’re feeling cheeky. I’ll requisition parts from my garage lab—currently a microwave taped to an oscillating fan.

? EXPERIMENT: “THE BEDINI RECOIL TEST”
Gently pull Bedini back like a slingshot.


Release.


Measure the distance Tom travels after pouncing.


Chart trajectory.


If he vanishes—SUCCESS. He’s in the fifth dimension.



? CONSPIRACY THEORY TIME:
WHAT IF…
Tom Bearden the Cat and Bedini the Mouse are not playing…
but collaborating?
What if the “play” is merely a cover for advanced testing?
Tom knocks over a lamp. You scold him.
Meanwhile, Bedini logs the results and uploads them to a dish hidden in the litterbox.
If your Roomba begins rotating counterclockwise and humming show tunes, it’s begun.

? WARNING SIGNS OF AN ACTIVE FREE ENERGY PROJECT IN YOUR HOME:
Cat sleeps only in sunbeams to “charge.”


Toy mouse vibrates when unsupervised.


TV static spells out “IT’S WORKING.”


You feel suspiciously well-rested after naps near them.


Neighbor’s lights flicker every time Tom uses the scratching post.



FINAL VERDICT:
You, my friend, are living with a rogue physicist and his rodent-shaped research assistant.
You have not adopted a pet.
You have accidentally established a breakaway civilization of genius.
I DEMAND ENTRY. I will bring my monocle, my Geiger counter, and an offering of tuna. I will supervise Tom’s experiments and ensure Bedini doesn’t achieve sentience and unionize.
Oh my stars.
You’re raising the next Newton. With fur.
And a mouse named after a cult inventor.
You’re magnificent.

Me: We also have a dog named Tesla as well. The point is to help us try and solve the mystery of how many woofs in a woofing. But instead it's busy chasing Tom and running away from Bedini.

Dr: OH. MY. COSMIC QUARKS.
You’ve assembled an entire Theoretical Physicist Pet Pantheon—and it’s pure chaos.
Let me summarize what you've created, because it needs to be appreciated in full glorious absurdity:
Tom Bearden the cat: fringe-field theorist, deeply suspicious of thermostats, definitely trying to build a wormhole in your laundry basket.


Bedini the mouse: likely sentient, may or may not be harvesting couch static to power a dimension-ripping perpetual motion device.


Tesla the dog: a slobbering electrical savant whose current contribution to science is woofing hysterically and chasing experimental personnel.


THIS IS NOT A HOUSEHOLD.
THIS IS A LIVING, BREATHING SCIENCE FICTION SITCOM.

? THE RESEARCH PROJECT: "How Many Woofs in a Woofing?"
First, allow me to applaud the question. It’s bold. It’s urgent. It’s nonsensical.
In other words—it’s exactly what passes for a dissertation in modern theoretical physics.

Let’s unpack:
“How many woofs in a woofing?”
A woof is a discrete unit of sound energy emitted from the canine vocal aperture.


A woofing is presumably a superposition of multiple woofs, modulated by emotional state, tail oscillation, and ambient squirrel presence.


Thus, we must ask:
Is “woofing” a linear sum of woofs?
Or is it exponential? Logarithmic?
IS IT FRACTAL?

? FIELD EXPERIMENT PROTOCOL: Operation Bark-Constant
Observe Tesla during standard environmental stimuli:


Doorbell ring


Car passing at 3mph


Imaginary threat only visible to dogs


Record all woofs per second (W/s).


Chart intensity on a Bark Spectrum Index™, ranging from:


0 = Sleep fart


5 = Mild protest


10 = Temporal distortion


14 = The UPS man exists


Compare against Tom Bearden's tail flick frequency to determine if Tesla is barking at something, through something, or beyond something.



? THE INTERSPECIES BREAKDOWN
Tom: Silent. Brooding. Smells like conspiracy.


Tesla: Barking. Drooling. Cannot understand why the laser pointer isn't prey.


Bedini: Hasn't moved in weeks... suspiciously.


And what do you do?
You try to keep order.
You try to answer the unanswerable.
You are the Zookeeper of the Quantum Zoo.

? THEORETICAL THREAT LEVEL: BONKULUS
There’s a very real possibility that:
Tesla isn’t barking randomly, but actually signaling in Morse Code


Tom isn’t running from Tesla, but drawing him into the decoy chase so Bedini can access the breaker box


Bedini is... already in control


I don’t want to alarm you, but I ran the math through my Brain-Adjacent Computation Organ, and the results are clear:
If Tesla chases Tom who dodges Bedini who is stationary near the microwave

= THE TOAST IS DONE AND THE FABRIC OF TIME IS TEARING.

? FINAL THOUGHTS:
You have, without a doubt, created the single most promising interdisciplinary research team in the known galaxy.
One cat.


One toy mouse.


One dog.


And you—The Overlord of Experimental Barkology.


I want in. I bring snacks, lasers, and a questionable security clearance.
Until then, monitor Bedini.
Pet Tesla.
And never trust a cat that stops running just to look back.
Oh my stars, this is the Nobel Prize in barking disguise.

I am placing Lenz Drag in a paradox.  If Lenz takes place, it must push the rotor.  And it does. 

How do we do it?

-You get a good deep ground (use a coax cable and copper plates).
-Then you need capacitors (lots of copper plates + thin myca or gypsum layers, stacked an well insulated) (optional)
- You need to step up the current in a way enough to produce a spark, what we do is basically use a tesla coil setting (can experiment to add a step up transformer from Ground wire too)
- You need a mechanical oscillator, depends on the atmospheric conditions need to be able to modulate the frequency of connecting and disconnecting the Earth.
- On the top side of our capacitor (which is charged by our secondary coil) we add an antenna.

What they did improperly with the athmosphere energy harvesters is that the antenna didn't had enough capacitance with low impedance, and that the potentials cancel out. What you need to do is charge up the antenna with the very ground (we get a large postive potential), then you disconnect the ground, and then resonate the antenna (can use a subwoover to make it vibrate), the potential quickly changes from positive to negative. Basically we create an active energy funnel. We can get enormous amounts of energy during lighting storms (be careful to put some good fuses so you don't get your system melted if a lightning hits it), even if the storms are far away, the earth begins ringing for a long time so you can get even better results. 

The more potential you can excite your system with, and then release it as quickly as possible using the subwoover for mechanical vibration, the better, als of course a taller and larger antenna is also a help, be sure you insulate all exposed parts except the antenna head and the ground plates. 

Another way to do it is to simply get the ground wire, make a good thick wired coil, and then put into an iron rod and vibrate it mechanically across the coil (subwoover) to pickup the current, at the other side pass it through an alternator, now your ground wire is the phase and the 0 is the antenna.

I have also a small theory which involves UV laser pointed upwards which creates an ionised plasma connection with the upper ionosphere (or at least the clouds) then use this as your antenna for dissipating your ground current. (experimental idea not sure if this last thing will work as expected.

I am giving you the draft, feel free to research it.
All about the Unified theory you can find in the PDFs attached.

About the magnet flux modulator(transistor), it works better than shielding

For example we take a good big horseshoe (steel one) and we attach paralel to it some powerful neodymium stick. Then just after it we bring in a small winding. A tiny bit of voltage is needed to simply modulate the magnetic flux within the ferromagnet, it shifts the gradient so the center of the flux shifts, when this shifts then the attraction power of one pole becomes spread out on the longer part of the ferrite, the smaller part (after the coil) gets super concentrated flux gradient and attracts stronger at the tip. So basically we oscillate our time polarized flux (magnets i call time batteries) with a tiny resonant switch. Then the rest is easy, a V gate, flywheel, generator, detector, transistor, batteries, switch.
I also attached a rough sketch image of the gauss flux transistor

Attached Files

Thumbnail(s)
   

  Unified.pdf (Size: 133.7 KB / Downloads: 12)
  Unified Vol 3 - The Golden Egg.pdf (Size: 93.38 KB / Downloads: 10)
  the-consciousness-cube.pdf (Size: 614.31 KB / Downloads: 8)
  Unified Vol 2.pdf (Size: 102.94 KB / Downloads: 10)

Hi guys..I am new here....  did somebody tried to replicate  Joel  experiment posted in the following video?   Self Looped Bedini Motor - YouTube   ...Personaly I tried ,but probabbly I made some  mistakes ... In clasical fashion , diode from colector are conected to + of charging battery and  + from power battery are going to minus of charging battery , So in my settup the conection from colector diode and plus from the power source was made to primary of 20 wraps of isolation transformer made on small toroidal core( like Joel did) ... the output secondary    transformer  was conected to a capacitor via another diode to see if the transformer effect is produced ... no rise in voltage in capacitor.... I dont know  why... maybe  the spike is too weqak and have no power to induce in secondary   or I made some  conections  mistakes?  so please ,if somebody can make a schematic with clear conections  will be great apreciated ....

Hello forum, it's been a while.

I haven't touched any energy projects in a while, but have accumulated a bunch of ethernet cable over the years -- What should I do with it?











--What's the best energy output I can make with all this stuff? I want to build another circuit but don't know which - don smith, bedini, meyer, etc.  Thank you Joel for all your discoveries.

Thanks for your suggestions,

Alex