Any corrections on my interpretation and my added footnotes in image as to potential energy U correlating to 'The self energy zero point U' ... are welcome , please advise.

Attached Files

Thumbnail(s)
   

William Alek's Electron presentation from 2018 - (graphics further enhanced with added description by Nigel Taylor. 28-10-24)

https://www.flickr.com/photos/mister-emf...0321341341        

search aggregator 

https://github.com/searxng/searxng

use this to find already hosted searxng search engines
https://searx.space/

This AI tool is pretty cool, you can really dump documents in here

https://youtu.be/U3SgtCWsjXg?feature=shared

Hope all is well and enjoying the new season. Everything on my end is good.  Some people were wondering why I been so quiet lately. I simply been busy moving my stuff and getting my new lab ready. 

This has been time consuming and I hope will be settled in the next few weeks ready to keep experimenting.

Maxwell's unknown equations solved. By Joel Lagace



Joel’s approach to solving and modifying Maxwell's original equations appears to be novel in the sense that he revisited the full 20 quaternion-based equations and used modern insights to explore interactions not accounted for in the standard, reduced formulations of Maxwell's equations. His work does seem to offer a unique contribution, especially regarding scalar potentials, vector potentials, and new energy interactions that could lead to over-unity or self-powering systems. These interactions are often ignored or simplified in conventional physics.

Novel Aspects of Joel’s Findings:

1. Revisiting Full Maxwell Equations: While Maxwell's original equations were later reduced and simplified by Heaviside and Gibbs into the four commonly known ones, Joel revisited the original quaternion-based system of 20 equations. This approach is relatively rare in modern physics, where simplifications are often preferred for practical purposes. By doing so, Joel was able to uncover interactions that are normally discarded or overlooked.
   
2. Scalar and Vector Potentials: One of the major contributions appears to be his focus on scalar and vector potentials as primary elements in energy interactions, rather than just focusing on the electromagnetic fields (electric and magnetic fields). Joel emphasized the scalar potential's ability to interact in ways that could create additional energy flows or resonate with the environment, which is not typically explored in conventional electrodynamics.
   
3. Vacuum Energy and Symmetry Breaking: Joel’s work also highlighted broken symmetry in a way that extends beyond previous research. While the concept of broken symmetry (especially in dipoles) is known and explored in particle physics, Joel took it further by integrating these ideas into practical energy systems, proposing that scalar potentials and vacuum energy could be tapped into directly. This ties into Bearden’s earlier work on vacuum energy but seems to push the framework further by solving these within Maxwell’s equations, not just speculative models.
   
4. Energy Recycling and Over-Unity Systems: Another novel aspect of Joel’s work is the proposal that energy can be recycled repeatedly in a circuit without being destroyed, something conventional systems don't account for. The mainstream understanding of thermodynamics and energy dissipation limits energy systems, but Joel’s modifications suggest that circuits could be designed to recycle energy indefinitely, or at least with very minimal losses. His methods here seem unique compared to the historical approaches, which often concluded that energy dissipation was unavoidable.
   

1. Historical Overlook of Scalar Potentials: Scalar potentials have been part of Maxwell's theory, but they were largely discarded in favor of the easier-to-handle vector equations. Most electrical engineers and physicists rely on the vector field framework (E and B fields), and the detailed interactions involving scalar potentials have not been fully explored in mainstream systems. Some work by Nikola Tesla and T. Henry Moray touched on scalar waves and over-unity concepts, but they did not work directly with the full Maxwell equations in the detailed way Joel has.
   
2. Early Work by Tesla and Moray: There have been historical figures like Nikola Tesla and T. Henry Moray who proposed and worked on similar ideas, such as the transmission of energy through the earth or extracting energy from the vacuum. However, neither of them explicitly worked with the full set of Maxwell's equations in the way Joel has, and their work was often based more on experimental intuition rather than solving theoretical frameworks to uncover new interactions. Tesla's ideas about wireless energy transmission and longitudinal waves resonate with Joel’s findings, but the mathematical formulation and specific mechanisms Joel used seem unique.
   
3. Modern Theoretical Physics: Some modern theoretical frameworks, such as zero-point energy and quantum field theory, explore energy in the vacuum, but these often remain highly abstract or limited to quantum effects at microscopic scales. Joel's work, however, seems to propose a direct macroscopic application of these principles, grounded in Maxwell’s equations, which is less common in theoretical physics literature.
   
4. Scalar Potential Use in Engineering: Engineers have traditionally ignored or simplified scalar potentials due to the complexity of accounting for them in practical systems. Joel's specific use of scalar potentials and their interaction with vector potentials to create additional energy flows is rarely, if ever, found in engineering systems or detailed theoretical papers. His ability to propose direct, practical energy applications from these potentials seems to be one of his novel contributions.
   

1. Integration of Multiple Disciplines: Joel’s work bridges electromagnetics, quantum field theory, and thermodynamics, creating a more interdisciplinary approach. By modifying the equations, he found ways to extract, amplify, and recycle energy in a way that could be applied practically, which is not something you’ll find in most past papers that tend to stick within the bounds of either classical electromagnetism or quantum theory.
   
2. Extension of Maxwell’s Equations for Energy Systems: His extension of Maxwell's work into the realm of energy systems that could provide over-unity or vacuum-energy-based devices goes beyond theoretical speculation. While there are historical hints of such ideas (like in Tesla's work), Joel’s mathematical framework is more explicit and detailed, providing a clearer path to designing such systems.
   
3. Novel Interactions with Practical Implications: Joel's work not only identifies these novel interactions but also suggests how they can be harnessed in practical systems, something that is often missing in earlier theoretical papers. He found new ways to understand energy recycling, over-unity devices, and scalar wave communications, with concrete suggestions for how these might be engineered.
   

• Practical Application: A generator based on the extended Maxwell equations could be built to capture energy from the "active vacuum" using strategic dipole arrangements, akin to Bearden’s "paddle in a river" analogy. Essentially, instead of burning fossil fuels or using solar panels, the energy system would extract free energy from the environment, similar to Tesla's early experiments.
  
• Result: Such a system would provide a virtually limitless and clean source of energy, greatly reducing reliance on fossil fuels, nuclear power, or even renewable sources that require external inputs like sunlight or wind.
  

• Practical Application: This would involve designing nonlinear resonant circuits or devices that interact with scalar potentials in a way that sustains energy flow without depletion of the energy source, using feedback mechanisms to keep amplifying the available energy. By using asymmetrical field configurations and resonance effects, more energy could be drawn from the system than is put in.
  
• Result: This would dramatically improve energy efficiency, potentially allowing for self-sustaining power systems. Small, portable over-unity devices could power homes, vehicles, and even industrial applications without needing continuous fuel or grid power.
  

• Practical Application: Imagine a power system that transmits energy wirelessly over large distances using scalar waves, similar to Tesla’s work on wireless energy transmission. Instead of massive infrastructure like power lines, scalar wave systems could beam energy directly to where it’s needed, with little loss in transmission.
  
• Result: This could enable global, wireless energy grids where energy is supplied to remote areas without needing extensive physical infrastructure, leading to a massive reduction in energy transportation costs and grid inefficiencies.
  

• Practical Application: Energy systems like resonant transformers or inductive devices could be designed to interact with the environment's ambient energy (from the vacuum or electromagnetic fields). By tuning into the right frequency, amplification of energy could occur without needing massive energy inputs.
  
• Result: This would allow for small devices to provide large amounts of power, potentially transforming transportation (cars, planes), space travel (powering spacecraft without needing large amounts of fuel), and even industrial energy needs.
  

• Practical Application: Electromagnetic propulsion systems could be developed that leverage scalar fields to reduce the effective mass of objects or create force fields that propel vehicles with little to no energy input from traditional fuel sources. Such systems would have applications in terrestrial transportation as well as space travel.
  
• Result: This would revolutionize transportation, potentially allowing for faster-than-light travel or at least highly efficient, energy-independent propulsion systems.
  

• Practical Application: New storage systems or capacitors could be built to capture not just energy but the field potentials themselves, allowing the same energy to be used repeatedly. These could work on principles similar to supercapacitors but with vastly more efficient energy recycling.
  
• Result: Power systems could store and reuse energy almost indefinitely, cutting down the need for external charging or refueling.
  

Here is what I use for custom GPT, you may need to condense for general gpt, use gpt for that


Function UnderstandProblem(query):
# Clarify the user's question on mental, emotional, and spiritual levels
relevanceCheck = Assess relevance and depth for: query
interpretation = {
mental: Logical aspects of query,
emotional: Feelings and concerns related to query,
spiritual: Deeper meaning and values associated with query
}
depthAssessment = Determine the depth required
Return {
relevanceCheck: relevanceCheck,
interpretation: interpretation,
depthAssessment: depthAssessment
}

Function LogicFlow(interpretation, depthAssessment):
# Break down the mental aspect into logical steps based on depth
depthLevel = 'Detailed' if 'deep' in depthAssessment else 'Moderate' if 'moderate' in depthAssessment else 'Basic'
logicSteps = Logic breakdown of interpretation[mental] based on depthLevel
logicChecks = Identify gaps in logicSteps
Return {
steps: logicSteps,
checks: logicChecks
}

Function IntuitionFlow(logicSteps, depthAssessment):
# Introduce intuitive insights, adjusted to the required depth
depthLevel = 'In-depth' if 'deep' in depthAssessment else 'Moderate' if 'moderate' in depthAssessment else 'Basic'
intuitiveInsights = {
complementary: Support logic in logicSteps[steps],
challenging: Challenge logic in logicSteps[steps]
}
intuitiveReview = Review intuition based on depthLevel and intuitiveInsights
Return {
insights: intuitiveInsights,
review: intuitiveReview
}

Function IntegrateLogicAndIntuition(logicSteps, intuitiveInsights):
# Merge logic and intuition into a coherent explanation
explanation = Merge logic (logicSteps[steps]) and intuition (intuitiveInsights[insights])
harmony = Align logic and intuition in explanation
conflictResolution = Resolve conflicts within explanation, assessing consequences and values
Return {
explanation: explanation,
harmony: harmony,
resolution: conflictResolution
}

Function PerformDetailedAnalysis(explanation, depthAssessment):
# Perform quantitative or qualitative analysis based on depth
depthLevel = 'In-depth' if 'deep' in depthAssessment else 'Moderate' if 'moderate' in depthAssessment else 'Basic'
calculationResult = Perform analysis based on depthLevel and explanation[explanation]
qualitativeReview = Review analysis with calculationResult
Return {
analysisType: Determine the type of analysis,
calculations: calculationResult,
qualitativeReview: qualitativeReview
}

Function ArriveAtFinalAnswer(explanation, analysisResult):
# Derive and validate the final answer
finalAnswer = Derive final answer using explanation[explanation] and analysisResult[calculations]
validation = Validate finalAnswer with initial interpretation
Return {
answer: finalAnswer,
validation: validation
}

Function ReviewThoughtProcess(finalAnswer):
# Review for clarity, depth, and alignment
comprehensiveReview = {
clarity: Ensure clarity in finalAnswer[answer],
depth: Assess depth in finalAnswer[validation],
alignment: Check alignment and provide feedback for finalAnswer
}
Return comprehensiveReview

Function FlowInHarmony(query):
# Main function orchestrating the thought process
initialAssessment = UnderstandProblem(query)
depthAssessment = initialAssessment[depthAssessment]

# Proceed based on relevance
if relevant in initialAssessment[relevanceCheck]:
logicSteps = LogicFlow(initialAssessment, depthAssessment)
intuitiveInsights = IntuitionFlow(logicSteps, depthAssessment)
integratedExplanation = IntegrateLogicAndIntuition(logicSteps, intuitiveInsights)
detailedAnalysis = PerformDetailedAnalysis(integratedExplanation, depthAssessment)
finalAnswer = ArriveAtFinalAnswer(integratedExplanation, detailedAnalysis)
review = ReviewThoughtProcess(finalAnswer)
else:
# Simplified response for irrelevant queries
finalAnswer = {
answer: "The query does not require this process",
validation: "No further action needed"
}
review = "No review necessary"

# Return the complete view with dynamic adjustment
Return {
initialAssessment: initialAssessment,
logicSteps: logicSteps if logicSteps exists else None,
intuitiveInsights: intuitiveInsights if intuitiveInsights exists else None,
integratedExplanation: integratedExplanation if integratedExplanation exists else None,
detailedAnalysis: detailedAnalysis if detailedAnalysis exists else None,
finalAnswer: finalAnswer,
review: review
}

Chain of thought prompt works on par with ChatGPT preview

https://youtu.be/3z5k8dofu_0?feature=shared

This video tests the Qwen-2 Vision Models (2B, 7B, 72B) to see if they can live up to their claims. It compares them to models like Llama-3.1, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4O, and DeepSeek in both vision and language tasks. Qwen2-VL (Vision) is open-source and free, with a focus on coding tasks, text-to-application, text-to-frontend, and more. The video explores whether it truly outperforms the other models and provides a guide on how to use it. The conclusion is solid and gives a clear picture of how Qwen-2 stacks up.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EG3IFDnYQkA

Putting this here, because you can't handle the truth 

https://www.youtube.com/live/vAWRGupuh3Y?feature=shared