Here I show the concept:

https://youtu.be/Xr9QSD889ZA

Have you ever wondered if there was a way to charge your batteries for free? Well, there is, and the electric company doesn't want you to know about it! As long as your battery has a plus and a negative, it can be charged, whether it's new or used, consumer or boat or car battery. And the best part? This method not only charges your batteries for free, but it also rejuvenates them and erases any "memory" they may have.

The method starts with using AC voltage. However, instead of using the typical 120 volts AC that most homes receive, we start with only 2.3 volts and 60 hertz. This voltage is sent to an X reactance "box," which has capacitor values that bring down the current to around 17 milliamps at 2.3 volts AC. The next step is to rectify this without using a filter cap. This is important because we want to generate pulsed voltage with zero or near-zero current. Voltage is provided by the electric company for free, while we pay for current. So, if we can find a way to utilize mostly only voltage, we are in big business.

The pulsed voltage is then used to feed a cap dump circuit that oscillates a higher voltage capacitor dump of around 35 volts into the charging battery. This generates a chemical reaction in the battery due to the real high voltage Joule or amps a second current dumping into it. It's important to note that this method only charges the battery and doesn't discharge it.

This is a cold charge, which means the batteries don't get hot and won't explode due to the quick pulse. This is in part thanks to Bedini's cap dump trick, which generates a current charge into the battery for later usage.

Using this method to charge something big like a car battery means you get to use that 600 amps for basically free. And, you used the electric company's voltage for free to do it by gating the current without creating a load.

It's important to note that this method isn't stealing from the electric company, cheating the battery industry, or even hacking. It's just science!

Here I explain the concept:

https://youtu.be/NuKK2ItjqoI

This project is based on the Tesla magnifying transmitter, which was a wireless power transmission system developed by Nikola Tesla in the early 20th century. In this specific project, a flat coil is used with a scalar wave generator. Scalar waves are a type of electromagnetic wave that is different from the conventional electromagnetic waves that we are more familiar with, such as radio waves or microwaves. Scalar waves are believed to exist in higher dimensions and have special properties, such as the ability to transmit energy without losing power over long distances.

The scalar wave generator produces scalar waves that resonate with the scalar coil. This resonance converts the scalar waves back into an electromagnetic field, which can then be rectified back into pulse DC using a rectifier circuit. The resulting pulse DC is used to charge a battery pack.

The battery pack consists of three AAA batteries that are charged using this system. The batteries can be rechargeable or non-rechargeable. The pack is housed in an old gamepad, which has been converted into a battery holder. The battery pack has four bars that indicate the battery level, which hardly takes any input current because the current is not much.

Underneath the battery pack is the scalar generator, and next to it is the scalar coil that picks up the electromagnetic field and converts it back into an electromagnetic wave. The induction light is placed near the coil and reacts to the scalar coil's field. Without the coil, there is no light, so the coil must be present to produce the field.

The system takes an input, and the output is more than the input due to the magnifying properties of the scalar waves and resonance. The power source can be turned off, and the battery pack will continue to hold the charge. The process doesn't take much power out of the input source, making it an efficient way of charging batteries.

Overall, this project demonstrates the concept of using Tesla's magnifying properties with scalar waves and resonance to charge batteries. Although Tesla was working on a much greater scale, this project showcases the potential of this technology on a smaller scale.

Here I show you the concept:

https://youtu.be/fVMpQQugA-0

The circuit takes advantage of the fact that voltage is free and current usage is what we pay for. The objective is to limit the current usage to zero or as close to zero as possible so that we can use the trigger voltage for free or at a very low cost.

The circuit starts by connecting a wire directly to the AC socket. We use the 60Hz AC cycle at 110 volts, which enters a diode bridge rectifier to filter out the negative part of the AC cycle. The circuit does not include a DC filtering cap as we want to keep the AC 60 cycle pulse.

On the other side of the AC wire entering the rectifier, we add a reactance X factor high voltage 1uf capacitor to limit the current usage to approximately 40ma using the formula I=v/x. It's crucial to use a high voltage X capacitor or a microwave high voltage capacitor as anything else could lead to an explosion. It is essential to exercise caution while operating this circuit as it can be dangerous to human or animal life due to the high voltage.

The X capacitor is the critical component of the circuit as it limits and gates the current usage to almost zero, ensuring that we never use more than 40ma of current.

The bridge rectifier charges a 400-volt 10uf capacitor at around 100 volts quickly with "zero" current 60-hertz positive pulsed DC. The voltage charge is limited to around 100 volts because the neon fires at 100 volts and triggers the SCR diode to dump a charged 100-volt capacitor as a real joule or amps a second current discharge into a battery.

The battery undergoes a negative resistance chemical effect due to the capacitive high voltage pulsed discharges, which occur around four times per second. The battery responds by having its ions move around, causing it to resonate and recharge in the process, thus producing real current for future use.

This circuit is a proof-of-concept device that will charge a battery slowly in a couple of days if the battery is in bad condition and as fast as a few hours if the battery is in good condition.

To take this concept seriously, one could remove the X current limiting capacitor stage and increase the 10uf capacitor's value drastically, paying for a few "amps." This way, the capacitor will charge with the current it needs from the mains line, allowing for a discharge at 100 volts with the neon dump or similar method. This will produce a much greater joule or amps per second discharge into a bank of massive batteries. This is where one would be converting amps to kilowatts. However, it is crucial to exercise extreme caution while operating this circuit.

Here I show you the concept:

https://youtu.be/pr4t4JKPkYM

I wanted to share my process for creating an energy-efficient lamp driver. While we can't make energy out of nothing, we can find ways to use very little input source and save money and effort.

Firstly, I use a current reactance limiter on the mains 60 hertz power line or any other source of 60 hertz 110 volts power, such as a generator or windmill. The current limiter uses Ohm's Law to limit the current to around 40 mA with 60 hertz and 1uf.

Then, I use the mostly pure voltage to quickly charge a 10uf or more capacitor with very little current input. The capacitor has an SCR diode that is triggered to dump this cap into an additional super capacitor bank a few times a second, resulting in a pure 100-volt capacitive joule or amps per second discharge. This pumping also has an electret-like effect while being pulsed.

An additional advantage of using a super capacitor bank is the elimination of the high impedance battery charging stage that needs more current. The 12-volt super capacitor bank takes the form of converted negative energy from the reactance box and capacitor high voltage pulses back into a form of regular low voltage higher current DC positive energy that is able to drive a very small and efficient high frequency AC inverter.

This inverter can drive a 15-watt lamp without any problems because of its high frequency. The 15-watt lamp operates at full spec lumens, usually requiring an input of 15 watts. However, we are driving it with only an input that we need to pay for of 40mA. The rest of the needed input is being provided by the local vacuum and clever circuitry. It is not a trick or a cheat for free energy bypass of the electric "smart" meter. The whole circuit except, respectfully, the super capacitor stage operates as an open-looped system, so it can re-gauge itself.

Not only does the lamp operate at full capacity in this fashion, but the voltage keeps rising on the super capacitor bank as it keeps getting many discharges of 100 volts a second from that 10+ uf capacitor dump simultaneously. The charge holds and even goes up instead of down as the super caps do a super job at converting this kind of power back into something useful!

I must point out that this lamp would not operate directly connected to the reactance X output of only 40mA. It requires 15 watts of input current at 60 hertz. We are not providing anything close to this level with this intentional current limiter stage. But at the end, we are able to light the lamp brightly and sustain the system with very little input drive from the operator, work-wise or money-wise. There is no free lunch, just efficiency.

I hope this information is helpful to you all. Please feel free to share your thoughts and opinions on this topic.

I been accused of such lately around the web with my various reactance current limiter devices.

So I spend a few moments reflecting on that....

Thanks.

https://youtu.be/zK3zOiWqSLQ

As some of you may know, I've been releasing several reactants circuits in recent months. These circuits are designed to limit your current usage from the mains power line, allowing for more efficient use of battery chargers, LED lamp drivers, and other low-current devices. I've stressed time and time again that these circuits do not provide "free energy" or allow you to bypass the electric company's meter.

Despite this, I've been bombarded with accusations of promoting illegal activities and even stealing electricity. Some of my work has been censored or deleted, and I've been flat-out accused of dishonesty and deceit.

To be clear, there is absolutely nothing illegal or unethical about using reactants to limit current usage. It's a very basic power supply technology that adheres to the principles of Ohm's law. If you calculate your reactance correctly and use the right components, you'll be using less than 40 milliwatts, which you still have to pay for. You're not stealing power or bypassing the meter.

It's incredibly frustrating to be accused of wrongdoing when all I'm doing is trying to improve energy efficiency and promote the use of renewable energy sources. I've put a lot of time and effort into developing these circuits, and I know they work because I've tested them myself.

I'm disappointed in the response I've received from certain segments of the over unity and free energy communities. You'd think that people who are tinkering with high voltage and building Tesla coils would have a basic understanding of reactance and Ohm's law. Yet, here we are.

I'd like to extend an invitation to anyone who has concerns or questions about my work to reach out to me directly. I'm happy to explain the principles behind my circuits and how they work. I believe that open communication and collaboration are essential to advancing our understanding of energy efficiency and renewable energy.

In closing, I want to thank you all for taking the time to listen to me. I hope that we can all move forward with a better understanding of each other's work and a shared commitment to making the world a more sustainable place.

Here I show you the concept:

https://youtu.be/3ju0WJfpwso

In response to criticism over some of my reactive circuits, I have put together a working demonstration that shows how we can achieve the same results through alternative methods. The key is to limit the current to its lowest necessary value to save on energy usage. The previous x-reactance method was just one approach among many.

In this demonstration, I use a low voltage square wave generator that operates at around 5 volts to trigger a base resistor of an NPN transistor. The transistor switches a 9-volt battery into a home-built 1.9 ohm air core coil, quickly wound with telephone cable of about 300 feet. We use diodes Bedini-style to feed the high voltage back EMF and quickly charge a 10uF capacitor to 100 volts with very little current. The sharp low 10% duty cycle holds back much of the current from leaving the 9-volt battery while producing loads of back EMF for quick charging and discharging of the 10uF capacitor at 100 volts, thanks to the SCR neon capacitor dump. We store this charge into a set of 12-volt supercapacitors, giving us steady DC in return, enough to run a small high-frequency inverter and drive the lamp at full lumens, which normally requires 15 watts at 60 hertz AC.

This circuit is more complicated, but it proves the concept further. It shows what can be done with very little current if utilized correctly. It's clear that this little 9-volt battery cannot produce "15" watts on its own without the help of additional systems such as pulsing, electrets, supercaps, high frequency, etc., thanks to running the circuit mostly as an open loop.

Here I show you the concept:

https://youtu.be/TwrTvueqvng

Using my back emf generator and inverter as isolator, with both inverter and small 12 volts dc power supply the whole thing needing a couple watts ( inverter power supply) Is able to charge the run battery and notice an instant voltage increase charge. I turn it off and it jumps back down a few microvolts! when turn it on again, A quick raising charge.

The point i'm trying to make is if your trying to get over unity with such coil pulsing  back emf type circuits, A good indicator that your on the sweet spot is the instantaneous voltage increase when you turn it on while running it's own load, You can test like I do and turn it off a few times and notice a sudden voltage drop at the battery but a gradual increase of a millivolts or so at every cycle. And keep restarting this over and over and notice a greater peak voltage every time you turn it on. When you notice this effect with your battery like I do, it's a good indication that you are on the right track and that the battery is responding nice to back emf, its kind of been a random hit and miss at what batteries work best at this type of conditioning. As someone has pointed out in some video comments, It's also important to keep an open loop system like I demonstrate in better details on my other videos. If you can like Bedini did, Find and use high voltage batteries instead. Less resistance more over unity.

hello to all I am happy to be on this forum, I have a small concern, I am looking for a solution to create small solar lighting units, anyone with a solution or who can help me will be welcome. best regards

Here is a concept I want to share:

https://youtu.be/mMcVGb_Lahg

In this post, I want to share with you a simple yet effective way to experiment with the back EMF radiant voltage spike, a concept John Bedini spoke of. With a big air core single coil and low voltage zero current pulsing, we can reproduce the same effects.

The idea behind this method is to trigger the high voltage back EMF voltage while holding back and gating the current. By keeping the spike sharp, we aim to use just pure voltage to save on energy usage or requiring very little input drive to produce this back EMF. We take this high voltage zero current radiant sharp spike and send it to two charging batteries hooked up in parallel.

To control the switching pulse width modulation, I use a simple tablet with software waveform generator, an analog sound card port output, and a control NPN switching transistor. The sound output from the tablet, set to a fast frequency of 2 kHz and tight duty cycle of 6 percent, triggers the base of the transistor to rapidly switch an input 9-volt battery, which is sent to a coil to collect the back EMF 30 plus high voltage radiant spike. The input battery doesn't "feel" it much, as we are limiting much of the current from leaving the input source.

This method allows us to achieve John Bedini's "get two for the price of one" trick without needing the wheel part. Even if you don't have a machine shop at the moment, you can still experiment with the Bedini process with this simple and effective method.

Here I show you the concept:

https://youtu.be/QYpwTJJ3lh8

I want to share with you my recent success in improving my Radiant Cap Dump Device. With the use of short and thick wires instead of high impedance test lead clips, I was able to achieve a stable and efficient setup that can maintain a 100 watts load while charging the battery with high voltage cap dump pulses.

The input requirement for this setup is only 9 volts DC and 60 mA from a wall transformer power supply. The rest of the energy, as Bedini would say, comes from the Vacuum or Negative Energy. The battery reacts to the steady high voltage discharges and transduces this pulse into real steady current of 100s of watts while maintaining a v/i curve or charging curve instead of a decline curve as one would expect from a 100 watt load. This is a kind of negative resistor.

In a previous video, I was able to run and maintain a 15-20 watt load from the charging battery without the v/i curve going down. With this improved setup, I am now able to do the same thing with holding a real 100 watts load on the battery while charging it with the radiant cap dump device at the same time. The v/i curve remains stable, and in fact, it starts to raise steadily after 2 minutes of operation.

The video demonstration of this setup is about 15 minutes long, but I wanted to show you start to finish what goes on. At first start, the battery shows a slight voltage drop, but after 2 minutes, the v/i curve stabilizes and soon starts to raise steadily as long as the battery keeps getting that high voltage cap dump pulse 2 times a second. I can hear a kind of boil sound when I put my ear next to the battery, so it must be doing something!

After about 15 minutes of run time in this video, you can see a significant increase in voltage by many points in comparison to the start of this demonstration as the v/i curve goes up. This is an awesome COP value - 9 volts 60mA input and 110 volts 100 watts 60 hertz output.

I hope this information is valuable to fellow experimenters. Please let me know your thoughts and questions in the comments section.