Gravitational shielding is a theoretical concept that involves creating a material or device that can block the effect of gravity on an object. The basic idea is to manipulate the gravitational field around an object so that it experiences a reduced force of gravity or is shielded from the gravitational field altogether.

One approach to gravitational shielding involves the use of materials with negative mass. Negative mass is a hypothetical concept where mass would behave in the opposite way to regular mass, i.e., it would repel other matter instead of attracting it. In theory, if negative mass materials could be created, they could be used to create a gravitational shield around an object, effectively shielding it from the effects of gravity.

Another approach to gravitational shielding involves the use of force fields. The idea is to create a field that interacts with the gravitational field, effectively creating a barrier that shields the object from the effects of gravity. This approach is largely theoretical, and there is currently no widely accepted scientific approach to achieving gravitational shielding using force fields.

It is important to note that while these approaches remain largely theoretical, they are still areas of active research in the field of physics. While it is currently not possible to achieve gravitational shielding or anti-gravity in a practical sense, continued research and development in these areas could potentially lead to new breakthroughs in our understanding of gravity and its manipulation. 

The concept of negative mass remains purely theoretical, and there is currently no known way to create negative mass in the real world. However, there are some theoretical approaches that have been proposed.

One idea is to create a substance that has negative inertial mass. Inertial mass is the property of an object that resists acceleration, and it is a key factor in determining the force of gravity that an object experiences. By creating a substance with negative inertial mass, it would theoretically repel other matter instead of attracting it, which is the opposite of what regular mass does.

Another approach involves manipulating the Higgs field, which is a field that permeates all of space and gives particles their mass. In theory, if the Higgs field could be manipulated in such a way that it produced negative mass particles, it could be used to create materials with negative mass properties.

From the Cejka Files:

Cejka - Anti Gravity Power

Attached Files

  Cejka - Anti-Gravity_Power.pdf (Size: 29.58 MB / Downloads: 29)

From the Cejka Files:

Cejka - Anomalous Cloud Phenomenon 9 April 1984 Bearden

Attached Files

  Cejka - Anomalous_Cloud_Phenomenon_9_April_1984-Bearden.pdf (Size: 29.08 MB / Downloads: 29)

From the Cejka Files:

Cejka - An Underground Electromagnetic Sounder Experiment I

Attached Files

  Cejka - An_Underground_Electromagnetic_Sounder_Experiment_I.pdf (Size: 2.79 MB / Downloads: 17)

From the Cejka Files:

Cejka - Alternator Having Portable Magnetic Field

Attached Files

  Cejka - Alternator_Having_Portable_Magnetic_Field.pdf (Size: 13.2 MB / Downloads: 29)

Here is an interesting old PDF from the "Cejka" Files

Cejka - A Mysterious Ore

Attached Files

  Cejka - A_Mysterious_Ore.pdf (Size: 3.95 MB / Downloads: 22)

Watsons Self Powering Generator

Jim Watson demonstrated a self-powering 8-kilowatt generator at the International Tesla Conference in Colorado Springs. This generator was a modified extension of smaller motors and generators built by Bedini over a period of years. At the conference, engineers from the audience were invited to the platform to perform their own independent measurements of the unit, while it was running and powering its load. The engineers directly confirmed that the system was delivering power to the load (as could be seen visually also), and that it was recharging its batteries as well.

Interestingly, one of Watson's batteries was stolen that night. The reason was obvious. First, at the conference there was present one of the major persons charged with suppression of COP>1.0 electrical power systems world wide, along with several of his henchmen. Since they have been involved in suppressing many dozens of similar COP>1.0 systems, they are thoroughly familiar with both the theory of COP>1.0 electrical power systems and the various types of devices and mechanisms that have been invented in that area over the past century.
One feature of Watson's unit was that it charged the batteries with negative energy (i.e., with Dirac sea hole current, or "cold energy" as sometimes referred to), and could use negative energy for powering the unit. Hence, his batteries became charged with negative energy as the machine ran and powered its loads. After much demonstration and running, such a negatively charged battery has its local curved vacuum charged with an appreciable number of unfilled Dirac holes. Such a negatively charged "battery supersystem" will then absorb positive energy charging (electron current charging) for a protracted period before it will start to change its voltage and accept the positive charge. Instead, during that protracted initial period the battery will just "eat electron currents and positive energy" from the battery charger, with no apparent effect and no change in Its discharged state or its voltage.
A very simple way to absolutely ascertain whether or not a unit such as Watson's (without a Bedini negative energy converter) is genuine, is to simply take one of his batteries from a unit that has been running quite a bit, and recharge it on a conventional battery charger. If it exhibits that two-phased recharge phenomenon, it proves that the unit is real and is indeed a true COP>1.0 device, or certainly has the potential to be one. Coupled with the demonstration and independent measurements, this removed all doubts about the validity of Watson's COP>1.0 system.

So it appears that certain parties who were concerned about that system decided to do the "simple test" to see if Watson's device was real. It was real, and so they discovered. At that point, the High Cabal — Winston Churchill's term — recognized they had another successful unit and inventor to suppress.
Bedini and I were in close contact with Watson over a period of years, as often as three or more times a week. Later, some time after that conference, abruptly Jim ceased all communication with his former close colleagues. For two days a rather crazy recording was on his phone, stating the Watsons had moved. Then that disappeared. Watson never again contacted either Bedini or me, or his own financial backer (the late R. J. Reynolds III). Even Reynolds could not find Watson's whereabouts at that time.
We are quite certain that Watson received the "offer he could not refuse". Simply put, this is the old Mafia trick of visiting the target, offering him a deal, and he has no choice but to accept or die. When this is used to suppress COP>1.0 systems, and some medical systems, the offer is usually: "Accept the money andyou and your family will live very comfortably, but you will never openly work on this again or communicate it. You either accept our generous offer, or you and your family will be dead when we leave here." Assuming that happened Watson had no choice but to accept the several million dollars offered him.
He is still alive, because Jeane Manning physically ran into him at a conference — and recognized him and spoke to him — whereupon he withdrew abruptly and left the conference very hastily.

Suppression of Free Energy Systems Has Been Common
 
This is only one of many cases we know of where such suppression of overunity systems and inventors has been accomplished. Others are not so benign. Marinov was killed with a longitudinal EM wave shooter in Europe, and his body was thrown off a building to make it appear a suicide. The police allowed the body to lie on the pavement for a protracted time (it was emitting longitudinal EM waves from the time-charging action of the strike). When finally moved, the pavement glowed in that area that had been underneath the body. Only one weapon on earth will kill a person in that manner, and that is a longitudinal EM wave "shooter".
Another prominent researcher was killed with a Venus technique (look it up, it's a distortion of the wave front) modified beam that plunges the heart into violent fibrillations. He rushed from a restaurant exclaiming, "They're killing me!" and died of a resulting heart attack. The present author was hit with just such a weapon in a restaurant here in Huntsville. A friend and I actually saw the weapon and the person wielding it. Knowing what it was and recognizing the symptoms, my seated companion and I were able to bolt out of the nearby back door during that minute or so we could still physically function. I personally saw the device and the person doing the beaming, and I have a witness to the event.
The partner of a colleague in Australia was killed on an upper floor by such a shooter from the street below, right through the walls. The assassin was observed, and was seen putting the bazooka-sized shooter back in his car, then speeding away. There are many other true incidents we could also relate, including a person killed by an ice-dart dipped in curare (a very professional hit method, used by some of the sinister arms of various intelligence systems). So there is more than just scientific work involved in pursuing COP>1.0 EM power systems. There can also be a direct threat to one's life, essentially at any time.
Almost any serious overunity researcher, who succeeds, will have had confrontations with assassination attempts, suppression attempts, threats, deliberate legal entanglements, etc. The present author is no exception. It is sad that one of the prerequisites for serious scientific work in this area is often a legal gun permit (for both the inventor and his wife) and either legally carrying a hidden weapon or never being very far from a weapon when working at home. As an old soldier, of course, one just shrugs and accepts it, and gets on with the job to the best of one's ability, albeit remaining very watchful and always on guard.

Here I explain the concept:

https://youtu.be/AjdURCTv4Mk

The process of generating an AC source from a phone line might sound like an impossible feat, but with the right equipment and knowledge, it is actually quite feasible. By utilizing a simple and efficient process of pulsing the phone line with a positive voltage, it is possible to create a 60Hz compatible AC source.

The process involves the use of a NPN transistor as a switch, which rapidly opens and closes the circuit to produce the desired frequency. The speed of the switching can be fine-tuned to produce a stable and reliable AC output. By using this method, it is possible to power small current devices such as LED bulbs.

To generate a higher voltage, an AC step-up transformer is employed. This device boosts the voltage from the phone line to a much higher level, typically around 110 volts AC. This voltage is more than enough to power small current devices and provide adequate lighting for a small space.

In conclusion, by pulsing the phone line with a positive voltage and utilizing a NPN transistor switch, it is possible to generate a stable and reliable AC source. By using an AC step-up transformer, this voltage can be boosted to power small current devices, making this a practical and cost-effective solution for lighting in certain situations.

Here I show the concept:

https://youtu.be/2GTu-Z811zI

In this video, I demonstrate a water-powered battery oscillator that I created using copper oxide and water. I discovered that by placing copper oxide in individual cups of water, I could generate enough voltage to power an AM broadcast transmitter. To take the project a step further, I separated the batteries into two packs, with the primary water battery running a simple flyback-type NPN-based oscillator.

To control the switching of the isolated water battery 2, I filtered the DC pulses generated by the oscillator with an on-board diode and sent them into the base of a PNP transistor. These pulses were then rectified back to DC and sent back into the primary oscillator circuit as feedback. What I observed with this type of "battery" is that it is capable of maintaining a charge indefinitely, as long as it is pulsed and given a short break to build up another charge of current through the chemical reaction.

This device also charges a single regular rechargeable AA 1.5 volt battery in about a day. As for the water battery, I found that it needed to have its water changed every few days due to a build-up of corrosion. Nevertheless, this is an interesting concept with potential for further experimentation and development.

Here I show the concept:

https://youtu.be/4ubmNVDp-oU


This project involves the use of a copper oxide layer and water to create a functional water "battery" that can power an AM broadcast transmitter. Taking the project one step further, the batteries were separated into two packs, with the primary water battery running a simple flyback type NPN based oscillator.

To enhance the performance of the circuit, DC pulses are filtered with one of the electronic lab's on-board diodes before being fed into the base of a PNP transistor, which controls the switching of the isolated water battery 2. The pulses generated by PNP Q2 connected to water battery 2 are rectified back to DC and sent back into the primary oscillator circuits, resulting in a kind of feedback that balances the power supply of the other circuit and keeps the device running for an extended period.

This type of "battery" seems to be able to maintain a charge indefinitely as long as it is pulsed with a short break in between to allow for the chemical reaction to occur. With a week-long runtime, the only maintenance required is the periodic changing of water due to corrosion buildup. Additionally, the device can also charge a single regular rechargeable AA 1.5-volt battery in about a day. This innovative concept has significant potential for various applications in the future.