The concept of pair creation, also known as the Bethe-Heitler process, provides strong evidence for the vortex model of photons. In this process, a photon decays into an electron and a positron when it interacts with a strong field, such as that found near an atomic nucleus.
### Photon to Electron-Positron Pair
1. **Pair Creation Process**
- When a photon interacts with a strong external field, it can transform into an electron (e-) and a positron (e+). This process is observable and demonstrates the transformation of electromagnetic energy into matter and antimatter.
- The electron and positron briefly localize and become detectable as individual particles.
2. **Form and Structure**
- **Photon**
In the vortex model, the photon consists of two oscillating discs. It does not participate in electromagnetic interactions because its electric field lines run internally between the discs.
- **Electron and Positron**
These particles are spherical in shape. The transformation from photon to electron-positron pair involves opening the field lines, which requires energy corresponding to the sum of the energies of the two particles.
### Conservation and Properties
1. **Energy Conservation**
- During pair creation, energy is conserved as the photon's energy is converted into the mass and kinetic energy of the electron and positron.
- Conversely, when an electron and positron annihilate, their combined energy is released as photons, consistent with the mass-energy equivalence principle.
2. **Wave-Particle Duality**
- Classical theory, as developed by Maxwell, describes light as an electromagnetic wave. This wave nature is experimentally confirmed by phenomena such as interference patterns.
- However, the particle nature of light is evident in experiments like the photoelectric effect and the Compton effect, where light behaves as discrete quanta (photons).
### Resolving the Dual Nature of Light
1. **Causality and Consistency**
- The vortex model resolves the apparent contradiction between the wave and particle nature of light by proposing that light can spontaneously transition from a wave to a particle (vortex) depending on the local field conditions.
- This model maintains the principle of causality by suggesting that light is either a wave or a particle, but never both simultaneously.
2. **Spontaneous Transition**
- The transition from wave to particle (and vice versa) conserves essential properties such as propagation speed (speed of light), oscillation frequency, and polarizability.
- This rolling up of the wave into a vortex may occur in experimental setups, like bubble chambers, and in biological systems, like the human eye, which detect photons.
### Implications for Detection and Observation
1. **Photon Detection**
- Human vision and photon detection devices are designed to perceive photons (vortices) rather than continuous electromagnetic fields or waves.
- This aligns with the observation that our sensory organs and instruments are tuned to detect discrete quanta of light rather than the underlying fields.
2. **Experimental Evidence**
- Experiments that demonstrate the wave nature of light, such as double-slit experiments, show interference patterns.
- Experiments that demonstrate the particle nature, like the photoelectric effect, show discrete interactions with matter.
### Conclusion
The vortex model of photons provides a coherent explanation for pair creation and the dual nature of light. By viewing photons as oscillating vortices that can transition between wave and particle states, this model aligns with observed phenomena and maintains the principle of causality. This approach not only explains the stability and properties of photons but also integrates seamlessly with both classical and quantum descriptions of electromagnetic radiation.
This perspective helps bridge the gap between theoretical models and experimental observations, offering a unified framework for understanding the fundamental nature of light and its interactions with matter.
Posted by: JoeLag - 07-20-2024, 12:38 AM - Forum: Physics
- No Replies
### The Hutchison Effect and Vortex Theory
The Hutchison Effect refers to a series of phenomena reportedly discovered by John Hutchison, including the levitation of heavy objects, the fusion of dissimilar materials, and the spontaneous fracturing of metal. These effects were allegedly produced by exposing objects to high-voltage static fields and Tesla coil fields.
### Hypothetical Explanation Using Vortex Theory
#### 1. **High-Voltage Static Fields and Potential Vortices**
- **Potential Vortices Formation**
High-voltage static fields can create intense electric fields. According to vortex theory, in a poor conductivity environment (like air or vacuum), these electric fields can form potential vortices.
- **Concentration Effect**
The potential vortices concentrate energy at their centers, creating extremely high-pressure points at specific locations within the material.
#### 2. **Tesla Coil Fields and Magnetic Vortices**
- **Magnetic Vortices**
Tesla coils generate high-frequency alternating currents, producing strong magnetic fields and corresponding magnetic vortices (eddy currents) in conductive materials.
- **Skin Effect and Eddy Currents**
These magnetic vortices cause the skin effect, where currents are concentrated on the surface of the material, potentially creating intense localized heating and stresses.
### Interaction of Electric and Magnetic Vortices
#### 1. **Fracturing and Cutting of Materials**
- **Localized Stresses**
The interaction between potential vortices (concentrated electric fields) and magnetic vortices (surface eddy currents) can create intense localized stresses within the material. These stresses can exceed the material's structural limits, causing it to fracture or even cut cleanly.
- **Rapid Energy Concentration**
The rapid concentration of energy at specific points due to the vortices can lead to instantaneous anomalies, such as sudden heating or cooling, which might explain reports of spontaneous fracturing or fusion of materials.
#### 2. **Levitation and Anomalies**
- **Electromagnetic Interference**
The interaction of high-voltage static fields with Tesla coil fields can create complex electromagnetic fields that interfere with gravitational and inertial forces at a local level. This interference might result in the levitation of objects, as seen in some Hutchison Effect demonstrations.
- **Micro-Scale Disruptions**
At a microscopic level, the concentrated vortices can disrupt atomic and molecular structures, causing anomalies such as unexpected melting or changes in material properties.
### Practical Approach to Explore Similar Effects
#### 1. **Setup**
- **Materials**
High-voltage static generator, Tesla coil, conductive and non-conductive materials (metal rods, plates, etc.), sensors for electric and magnetic fields.
- **Procedure**
1. Place the materials in a controlled environment where you can safely apply high-voltage static fields and Tesla coil fields.
2. Use sensors to monitor the electric and magnetic fields and observe the interactions.
#### 2. **Observations**
- **Field Distribution**: Measure how the electric and magnetic fields are distributed around the materials.
- **Material Changes**: Observe any changes in the materials, such as fracturing, cutting, or fusion, and document these phenomena.
### Expected Results
1. **Fracturing and Cutting**: Look for clean cuts or fractures in the materials, indicating intense localized stresses caused by the interacting vortices.
2. **Levitation**: Observe any unexpected movement or levitation of objects, potentially due to electromagnetic interference.
3. **Material Anomalies**: Document any changes in the physical properties of the materials, such as unexpected melting or bonding.
### Conclusion
The Hutchison Effect can be hypothetically explained using the concepts of potential and magnetic vortices. High-voltage static fields and Tesla coil fields create intense, localized stresses and energy concentrations within materials, leading to the observed phenomena. By exploring these interactions experimentally, we can gain deeper insights into the fundamental principles underlying these effects and their potential applications in advanced energy systems and materials science.
This explanation aligns with Tom Bearden's speculative and innovative approach, encouraging further investigation into unconventional electromagnetic phenomena and their practical implications.
Field-Theoretical Approach
The field-theoretical approach suggests removing the electron from traditional field equations and introducing the concept of potential vortices in the electric field. This approach posits that electromagnetic waves can spontaneously form vortices when disturbed, leading to the creation of vortex particles. These particles, compressed into tiny spheres due to the concentration effect of the potential vortex, owe their physical reality to:
Concentration Effect: The potential vortex compresses the particle to a small dimension.
Oscillation Localization: The particle oscillates around a fixed point, giving it stability and localization.
Key Concepts and Questions
Why is the Elementary Quantum Stable?
Answer: The stability of elementary quanta, such as electrons, arises from the potential vortex formation in environments with poor conductivity, like a vacuum.
Poor Conductivity: Increases the formation of potential vortices.
Concentration Effect: Compresses particles into smaller, more stable spherical forms.
Relaxation Time: Longer relaxation times in poor conductive environments slow down the decay of vortices, leading to increased stability.
In the ideal vacuum, spherical vortices have absolute stability due to the absence of conductivity, preventing decay.
Why Does Every Particle of Matter Have an Antiparticle?
Answer: Each vortex can oscillate in two directions, creating two types of spherical vortices with equal rights.
Opposite Oscillation: Vortices can oscillate in either direction, resulting in matter and antimatter counterparts.
Why Are Particles and Antiparticles Incompatible?
Answer: Particles and antiparticles are incompatible because of their contrary swirl directions.
Mutual Destruction: Like two trains on a collision course on a single track, particles and antiparticles tend to annihilate each other when they meet.
Quantum Physical Approach vs. Field-Theoretical Approach
The traditional quantum physical approach has struggled to answer these fundamental questions, leading to the introduction of hypothetical particles like gluons to explain binding forces. However, the field-theoretical approach offers a different perspective:
Observable Phenomena: It explains the contraction observed in both the microcosm and macrocosm without introducing unobservable new matter.
Sluons and Gluons: Traditional theory posits gluons as massless binding particles exerting pressure on quarks, yet these particles remain undetected and their properties are speculative.
Practical Implications and Experiments
To explore these concepts practically, consider the following experiments:
1. Creating and Observing Vortex Particles
Setup:
Materials: High-frequency electromagnetic wave generator, vacuum chamber, sensors for electric and magnetic fields.
Procedure:
Generate high-frequency electromagnetic waves in the vacuum chamber.
Introduce disturbances to induce vortex formation.
Use sensors to detect and measure the resulting vortices.
What to Look For:
Vortex Formation: Observe the formation of potential vortices and their stability over time.
Particle Behavior: Measure how these vortices compress and oscillate, indicating the presence of vortex particles.
2. Studying Particle and Antiparticle Interactions
Setup:
Materials: Particle accelerator, detectors for particle collisions, data analysis software.
Procedure:
Accelerate particles and antiparticles towards each other.
Observe and record the interactions and annihilations.
Analyze the resulting energy release and particle behavior.
What to Look For:
Annihilation Events: Document instances where particles and antiparticles annihilate each other.
Energy Conversion: Measure the energy released during these events, consistent with E = mc^2
Conclusion
The field-theoretical approach, which introduces potential vortices, provides coherent explanations for the stability and behavior of elementary particles. It addresses why particles appear as monopoles, why they are spherical, and why each particle has a corresponding antiparticle. By exploring these concepts experimentally, we can gain deeper insights into the fundamental nature of matter and antimatter, potentially leading to new discoveries in particle physics and field theory. This perspective aligns with innovative approaches to understanding electromagnetic phenomena and their implications.
### The Photon as a Vortex Ring
The concept of the photon can be understood through the lens of potential vortices, drawing on principles from flow dynamics. By examining how vortex rings behave, we can derive several properties of the photon.
### Vortex Rings in Flow Dynamics
1. **Vortex Ring Propagation**:
- Vortex rings are not stationary; they propagate through space at a constant speed.
- The speed of propagation increases as the ring diameter decreases.
- Two vortex rings with the same axis and direction of rotation can oscillate around each other, attracting, accelerating, and contracting.
### Applying Vortex Ring Properties to Electromagnetic Fields
#### Formation of Photon from Electron and Positron
1. **Electron and Positron Interaction**:
- An electron (e-) and a positron (e+) have opposite swirl directions and attract each other.
- Instead of mutual destruction, they can open their vortex centers to form a stable vortex ring.
- In this configuration, the positively charged center of the electron matches the swirl direction of the positron, allowing stable oscillation.
2. **Oscillating Electron-Positron Pair**:
- The oscillation of this pair results in alternating positive and negative charges.
- Over time, the average charge is zero, meaning no net electromagnetic interaction.
- The particle alternates between matter and antimatter states, resulting in no net mass.
### Properties of the Photon
1. **Mass and Charge**:
- The oscillating nature of the electron-positron pair means the photon has no measurable mass or charge.
- It interacts primarily through the oscillation of the dual vortices.
3. **Spin and Angular Momentum**:
- The photon exhibits a spin of one quantum of angular momentum (h-bar).
- If the electron and positron rotate around the common z-axis in opposite directions, the average spin will be zero.
4. **Oscillation Frequency**:
- The photon is characterized by a constant oscillation frequency, which can vary but must remain constant for each photon.
### Conclusion: Photon as a Quantum of Light
By analyzing the potential vortex theory, we derive the following properties for the photon:
1. **No Mass or Charge**: Due to the alternating states of matter and antimatter.
2. **Propagation at Speed of Light**: The open center allows the photon to move at c.
3. **Spin of Quantum Angular Momentum**: Derived from the intrinsic rotation around the z-axis.
4. **Constant Oscillation Frequency**: A fundamental characteristic of the photon.
These derived properties align with the known characteristics of photons in quantum mechanics, suggesting that photons can indeed be understood as oscillating vortex rings of electromagnetic fields.
This interpretation provides a novel perspective on the nature of photons, integrating flow dynamics and vortex theory into the field-theoretical framework of quantum electrodynamics. This approach not only enhances our understanding of photons but also offers potential insights into other quantum phenomena through the lens of field vortices.
joel i was wondering what happened to your video i believe it was titled something like "multidimensional wifi" i recently had a idea and i wished i had saved that video could you explain a little about your receiver you used in your box i know you used a sdr to recieve it but where did you get the scalar receiver would it be possible to wind something yourself if i remember correctly you used printed coils and did it have additional Circuitry?. much appreciated Thank you for your videos
I have a magic garden crystal kit copper zinc battery working for ten years without recharging, Add a mixture consisting of 100-ml sodium silicate solution with 400 ml distilled water., the magic rocks are like DNA building and electricity consumption deplete them but they build up again recharging alone. https://www.thoughtco.com/make-your-own-...cks-607653 As the silicate crystals grow the battery recharges alone.
I'm curious about what you had in mind that you couldn't say it in the video because it could be unsafe. You said you could send a private message for those who are curious.
Key comment:
It absolutely has to do with cold electricity (Tibor's version). All the transformers are reversed, meaning
the primary is the HV winding and the output is the line voltage winding. There is nothing in the blue
box, except for the HV/HF driver to a FWB and to the two capacitors and the spark gap. It is like
Zilana's final disclosure with two small caps one in parallel, one in series with the spark gap. You can
have as many MOTs as you want, as long as they have similar input impedances. I am running all
those lights with (2 ) 1uF capacitors. It absolutely shouldn't work, but it does. Years ago, I exchanged
some comments with Kurt on his experiments, and I hope he has seen this video. I probably started
building Tesla coils 5 years ago, but the resonance concept, I found hard to build and tune, so I just
built PNP slayer circuits, which brought me here. What I have experienced, is that many people took
Don Smith comments and placed them in unreal constructs. The two worse misplaced topics are 1.
Earth Grounding, 2. Resonance. They are important maybe to some, but not to me. They make
transmission possible, but I don't need to use it in the device in the video. Not saying that the device
doesn't achieve resonance on its own. If you have a coil, capacitors and a spark gap fed by DC, you will
produce a tank circuit. However, my secondary goes to a FWBR so I can fill a large cap, and drives DC
LED bulbs. Don Smith said his DSE didn't require tuning, and moron level comprehension. So I chose
that device. I have disclosed everything to you how to build this circuit. The thing is, until the light bulb
goes off in your head, you wont know how to build these things. For me it turned on after reading Tibor
Kemeny's patent and asked how can he possibly get power from that? Then I saw what Tibor meant,
and how to leverage it. Then, what Don said about chasing the wrong rabbit was 20/20. Don's
statements about violating Ohm's Law, and room temperature superconductivity, and as many copies
as you want.... all where understood.
@XR_IX
The special transformer is k101, a high frequency amorphous metal transformer core
