Hey Joel, good to meet you. First I want to thank you for your findings and making them public. It's extremely rare and difficult to come across people like you because your interest is at the heart of technology, even if it's suppressed or under the table. All of what you mentioned in the video is correct. Radiant energy and back EMF are one of my favorite hobbies because they give you a lot of potential, and it seems that based around that concept you have been posting inspirational content around this, which makes it a lot more exciting. The phenomenon is in fact over unity, and I have drawn out a couple radiant chargers and implemented Ritalie's radiant chargers as an example to make it available for those who want to experiment, which I may post later on.

What I wanted to touch on was the 100 watts of free energy video you did on the capacitor dump circuit that would charge through an electrolytic capacitor, and discharge through a neon lamp. I have to say, you give yourself a lot less credit than you deserve. And even though you say "oh well its just a simple circuit" or that "all i did was xyz," you can't ignore the fact that you have put together something spectacular.

Although there wasn't a specific schematic for your circuit in the video, I was able to follow along with it enough to know what you were talking about, along with what was clarified in the comments.





I can't guarantee the schematic here is exactly correct as in the video, but for firing back EMF at resonance to the coil, it serves a purpose.

A lot of questions people had were about the coil in the video, as it's just an ethernet or telephone cable wound around a spool. This is very easy to make, but there's a misconception that makes it harder than at first looks apparent. This coil CANNOT exceed 2 Ohms, anything over and you are losing current. The resistance is intentionally low, (all wires at both ends shorted) to preserve the voltage after the loop.

The coil also NEEDS a lot of surface area to draw in as much radiant energy as possible. That can take some experimenting. In your video, Joel, the telephone cord you have has 4 wires, and some people were wondering about an RJ45 ethernet cable which has 8 wires. So, will that work? The answer is yes, as long as the coil does NOT exceed 2 ohms, and you are combining all wires at each end. Stranded copper is also best, because there is more surface area within a volume on smaller wires than one large wire.

Thanks for your demonstration, and I'll make any changes as needed in the schematic. I'll post some other circuits as well for inspiration on Radiant energy in the future.

Hi im looking for schematics of neurophone build any information would be helpfull.

From The Cejka Files.

Cejka - Design Construction and Operating Principles of Electro magnetics for Attracting Copper Aluminum "gold"

Attached Files

  Cejka--DesignConstructionandOperatingPrinciplesofElectromagneticsforAttractingCopperAluminum.pdf (Size: 12.41 MB / Downloads: 38)

From the Cejka Files.

Cejka - DC Motor Having Improved Commutation Means Peterson - Kromrey

Attached Files

  Cejka--DCMotorHavingImprovedCommutationMeansPeterson-Kromrey.pdf (Size: 6.7 MB / Downloads: 18)

From the Cejka Files

Cejka - Crystal Growth and Segregation

Attached Files

  Cejka--CrystalGrowthandSegregation.pdf (Size: 4.24 MB / Downloads: 12)

I have noticed that most researchers and experimenters reach to the same spot in their experiments: static electricity where current, as we know it, is small or almost undetectable, while voltage is well pronounced.

Tesla, Paul Baumann (Testatika), Paul Newman, and many more do the same. I haven't read Bedini's works, but from what I have seen he's using pressure (voltage) almost exclusively. The same occurs with your experiments, Joel, where you try to avoid current at all costs.

I've been always wondering why people say there's no energy in the static electricity while you get a very solid shock when you get in touch with it. The human body works in a similar fashion. The currents are quite weak while the voltages are easily measured. The human is a very efficient organism and this makes me think that voltage-controlled operations are the most efficient.

I've just read a couple of Bedini's replies (to letters or on forums, not sure) and saw that what we are not able to detect or measure is what is actually doing the work. Joseph Newman also says something similar (recalling from memory): current is a measure of power dissipation or power loss. Tesla also detects current by seeing how much losses there are in an induction coil charged by static electricity (the Tesla transformer).

When Tesla describes ways to utilize the static electricity he presents new kinds of lamps and new motors. As most of those were not adopted (with certain exceptions like the fluorescent lamps) we are struggling to find ways to convert the electricity that is found in nature (static electricity) into the electricity we are using right now and I feel there's something totally wrong about it. It is like buying an expensive tablet to use it as a cutting board.

From the Cejka Files

Cejka - Cole Motor

Attached Files

  Cejka--ColeMotor.pdf (Size: 1.7 MB / Downloads: 26)

From the Cejka files

Cejka - Cole Generator

Attached Files

  Cejka--ColeGenerator.pdf (Size: 7.38 MB / Downloads: 28)

From the Cejka Files

Cejka - Circuit for Reducing Voltage Stress Across a Transformer

Attached Files

  Cejka--CircuitforReducingVoltageStressAcrossaTransformer.pdf (Size: 2.39 MB / Downloads: 12)

From the Cejka Files

Cejka - Cernitin

Attached Files

  Cejka--Cernitin.pdf (Size: 39.73 MB / Downloads: 18)