<![CDATA[Forums - Alternative & Free Energy]]> http://typeright.social/forum/ Tue, 19 May 2026 13:03:55 +0000 MyBB <![CDATA[RE:]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=544 Wed, 13 May 2026 15:02:28 +0200 NeonPirate]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=544 Example - 50 ohm Current Balun
ref. to Joel Lagace
The Cascaded Velocity Shift

.jpg   Current Balun 50 ohm.jpg (Size: 966.84 KB / Downloads: 13) ]]> Example - 50 ohm Current Balun
ref. to Joel Lagace
The Cascaded Velocity Shift

.jpg   Current Balun 50 ohm.jpg (Size: 966.84 KB / Downloads: 13) ]]> <![CDATA[Demystifying Bedini Scalar North & Bloch Walls]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=543 Sun, 10 May 2026 11:18:32 +0200 NeonPirate]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=543 Demystifying Bedini 'Scalar North' & 'Bloch Walls'

I would like to say i grasped the scalar north term phrased by John Bedini referring to like poles of magnets being forced together but i never really did ... why ... because he never actually defined clearly this particular area for us amateurs that i can remember though both he and Tom Bearden used overlapping terms however the this fact seems to remain.


From everything i have researched with the additional assistance of 'Ai' it appears to me Bedini's use of the term scalar north was at best an 'unnecessary distraction' for a 'scalar dimension' is more accurately used to 'model a Bloch wall'.

The question that never occurred to me as it never seemed to apply ... in fact it seemed quite contrary to the subject was " Is Bedini's scalar north in fact a 'Bloch wall ' despite being oriented in opposition to a 'North-BLOCH-South' topology ?

I feel like possibly i am the first person to adress this matter within the entire field of
Alternative Energy.

Below is a Zip file of folders with separate headings that may seem obscure until you read their content and reflect upon why i created those titles ... i believe i have asked some of the most PERTINENT questions with answers given that are fundamental to Above Unity transformer research at any level from beginner  to advanced.
P.S. ... all i ask is that you dont laugh in my face ... only behind my back ...


.png   is a bloch wall a repulsive magnetic barrier.png (Size: 336.18 KB / Downloads: 54)

.zip   The Figuera files.zip (Size: 31.98 MB / Downloads: 3)

.png   Nort-North or South-South and Bloch Walls.png (Size: 348.74 KB / Downloads: 54) ]]> Demystifying Bedini 'Scalar North' & 'Bloch Walls'

I would like to say i grasped the scalar north term phrased by John Bedini referring to like poles of magnets being forced together but i never really did ... why ... because he never actually defined clearly this particular area for us amateurs that i can remember though both he and Tom Bearden used overlapping terms however the this fact seems to remain.


From everything i have researched with the additional assistance of 'Ai' it appears to me Bedini's use of the term scalar north was at best an 'unnecessary distraction' for a 'scalar dimension' is more accurately used to 'model a Bloch wall'.

The question that never occurred to me as it never seemed to apply ... in fact it seemed quite contrary to the subject was " Is Bedini's scalar north in fact a 'Bloch wall ' despite being oriented in opposition to a 'North-BLOCH-South' topology ?

I feel like possibly i am the first person to adress this matter within the entire field of
Alternative Energy.

Below is a Zip file of folders with separate headings that may seem obscure until you read their content and reflect upon why i created those titles ... i believe i have asked some of the most PERTINENT questions with answers given that are fundamental to Above Unity transformer research at any level from beginner  to advanced.
P.S. ... all i ask is that you dont laugh in my face ... only behind my back ...


.png   is a bloch wall a repulsive magnetic barrier.png (Size: 336.18 KB / Downloads: 54)

.zip   The Figuera files.zip (Size: 31.98 MB / Downloads: 3)

.png   Nort-North or South-South and Bloch Walls.png (Size: 348.74 KB / Downloads: 54) ]]> <![CDATA[Electric power generation made easy]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=541 Wed, 18 Mar 2026 19:22:31 +0100 Mozart]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=541
All silly questions answered, proof of concept building cheap solution large available components

.pdf   electric-power-harvesting-made-easy.pdf (Size: 2.59 MB / Downloads: 30) ]]>
All silly questions answered, proof of concept building cheap solution large available components

.pdf   electric-power-harvesting-made-easy.pdf (Size: 2.59 MB / Downloads: 30) ]]> <![CDATA[The Time-Domain Secret]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=539 Tue, 10 Mar 2026 23:49:04 +0100 JoeLag]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=539
If you want to understand why the world is in an energy crisis, look no further than the "U(1) Model." That’s the standard, simplified electromagnetics taught in every university. It assumes space-time is flat and the vacuum is empty.


It’s been falsified for nearly a century.
To truly engineer energy—to tap the "Free Energy" of the universe—you have to stop looking at wires and start looking at Potentials.


The Earth as a Living Capacitor:


Normal "fair weather" conditions provide about 150 to 300 volts per meter as you move up from the Earth’s surface. You don’t feel it because your body is "comfortable" in that background. But when a thunderstorm rolls in, that potential drops to zero and reverses. That "stuffy" feeling you get? That’s your biological system reacting to a change in the ambient potential.


Nature is performing a "Roto-Rooter" on your cells, flushing the system with shifting potentials. In my research, I’ve shown that Potential is an inflow of energy from the fourth axis (time) translated into longitudinal wave energy in our 3D space. When you change the potential, you change the rate at which time-energy enters our world.


The "Rotated Frame" Breakthrough


I’ve looked at the machines of many inventors—the ones the "orthodoxy" calls frauds. What they’ve actually found is a way to charge a system in a rotated frame.
By shifting the ambient potential sharply, you essentially rotate the local space-time out of the "lab frame." In this rotated state:


Capacitance changes.
Charge changes.


The rules of "Flat" Physics no longer apply:


If you charge a capacitor in a rotated frame and then "snatch" it back into the lab frame, you get more charge out than you put in. You haven't violated the laws of nature; you’ve just bypassed the "special case" laws that assume space-time can't curve.


The "Super System" vs. The Dogma:


The scientific community is currently locked in a "fundamentalist" religion. They ignore 600+ repeatable experiments in Cold Fusion and Over-Unity because their model says it "can’t happen." That’s not science; that’s Dogma.


To understand these experiments, we must move to Super System Analysis. A Super System consists of three interacting parts:


The Normal System (The wires, the battery, the flat space-time stuff).


The Active Vacuum (The seething sea of energy interacting with every charge).


Local Curvature of Space-Time (The interaction of all masses and charges).


If you aren't analyzing all three, you aren't doing real physics.


Transmuting Chemistry without Chemicals:


We are now at the point where we can use Scalar Wave Technology to change the physical properties of chemicals without changing the chemical itself. The chemists say it’s impossible because they are looking at a "flat" model.


But when you realize that every charge is a broken symmetry—a gate that is constantly pouring energy from the vacuum into our space—you realize that by "tickling" that gate with the right frequency and potential, you can change the very fabric of reality.

We don't need to argue about whether "Free Energy" experiments are real. If they are repeatable, they are real. We need to argue about the Model.

The U(1) model is a bicycle; we are trying to fly a starship.


It’s time to move to higher-group symmetries—non-Abelian electromagnetics—and start engineering the vacuum. The models exist (Evans, Sachs, Barrett). The experiments are done. The only thing left is to break the mindset.
The model isn't the reality. The experiment is.


The Source Charge Secret: Why Every Electron is a Free Energy Machine



If you take a single charge and put it on a table, it immediately starts radiating electromagnetic energy in all directions at the speed of light. If that charge stays there for a century, it creates a field that reaches out a hundred light-years.


Where is that energy coming from?


The "orthodoxy" has no answer. They violate the conservation of energy every day by pretending this energy is just "there" without a source. I call this the Source Charge Problem. To solve it, we have to look where the textbooks refuse to go: the Fourth Dimension—Time.


The Charge as a Gated Dipole:


A charge is not a static ball; it is a broken symmetry in the vacuum flux. Think of it like a whirlpool in a river. The water (energy) isn't "created" by the whirlpool; it flows in from the environment.


In the case of an electron, the energy is flowing in from the Time Domain (the 4th axis). The particle’s "spin" is the mechanism. It absorbs non-observable energy from the time axis, rotates it, and pours it out into our 3D space as longitudinal EM waves.
Time is Compressed Energy (E=mt2)


We all know Einstein’s E=mc2. But most people don't realize that Time itself is pure energy, compressed by the factor of c2. Time has the same energy density as mass.
When a source charge "consumes" time, it is converting a massive amount of temporal potential into spatial energy. This is why Nikola Tesla was so interested in low frequencies. In a photon, if you decrease the spatial energy (frequency), the amount of time-energy it carries goes up. The real "High Energy Physics" isn't in massive colliders; it's in the low-frequency conversion of time into power.


The 5 "Magic" Functions of an Open System:


By using the time-domain as our source, we move from "Equilibrium Thermodynamics" (where you always lose) to Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics (where you can win). As Ilya Prigogine proved in his Nobel-winning work, an open system far from equilibrium can:


Self-Order: Structure emerges from chaos automatically.


Self-Oscillate: It can maintain its own pulse.


Output more energy than you put in: It taps the environment (the vacuum).


Power itself in a load: It becomes a self-sustaining circuit.


Produce Negative Energy: It can actually cool the environment while providing power (convergent energy).


Breaking the U(1) Dogma:


The reason your local physics professor will call this "impossible" is because he is trapped in the U(1) Electrodynamics model. This model was built on the assumption of a flat space-time and an empty vacuum. It was falsified in 1957 when Lee and Yang won the Nobel Prize for discovering Broken Symmetry.


If the symmetry is broken, the conservation of energy must be calculated across the entire system—including the vacuum and the time-domain. When you do that, "Over-Unity" isn't a violation of law; it's an inevitable result of open-system engineering.



We are surrounded by a sea of energy so dense that a coffee cup’s worth of "empty space" could boil the world’s oceans. The source charge is nature’s way of showing us the door is already open.


Stop trying to "make" energy. Start learning how to gate the energy that is already pouring through every atom in your body.



Beyond the "Rowboat" Equations: Engineering the Super System



The standard thermodynamics you were taught in school is a lie of omission. They taught you the Second Law, which says everything must decay into disorder. But they forgot to tell you that the Second Law only applies to closed systems in equilibrium.
Every charge and every dipole in the universe is a Broken Symmetry. It is an open system, constantly exchanging energy with the time-domain. Nature has been running a "Giant Negentropy" operation for 14 billion years. If the "laws" of the 19th century were absolute, the universe would have run out of gas a long time ago.


The Death of the U(1) Model:


Our current electrical engineering and chemistry are based on the U(1) model. This model assumes a flat space-time and no interaction with the vacuum. It was created by Oliver Heaviside and refined by Lorentz in the 1880s—before we even discovered the electron!


They "symmetrized" Maxwell’s original equations because they were too hard to solve by hand. They threw out the "messy" parts to make the math easier. In doing so, they threw out the ability to model Over-Unity and Cold Fusion. They threw out the "Super System."


What is a Super System?


To understand the "anomalies" in your lab, you have to stop looking at the "System" and start looking at the "Super System." It has three components:


The Physical Apparatus: The wires, the chemicals, the battery.


The Active Local Vacuum: The seething energy flux that interacts with every charge.


Local Curvature of Space-Time: The gravitational and temporal warping caused by high-potential gradients.


When these three interact, you get "magic." You get reactions that don't produce heat (exothermic suppression) because the energy is being shunted into a rotated frame. You are charging the system in "Time" and discharging it in "Space."


The "Sachs" and "Evans" Solutions:


We don't have to guess how this works. The models already exist in higher-symmetry physics:


Sachs Unified Field Theory: A model that is completely engineerable and includes the vacuum in every calculation.
O(3) Electrodynamics: Developed by Dr. Myron Evans, this model accounts for the longitudinal waves that the standard U(1) model ignores.
SU(2) Group Symmetry: Used by researchers like Dr. Barrett to explain ultra-wideband phenomena and higher-order EM interactions.


The Business of Suppression:


Why aren't these taught in universities? Follow the money. If we move to a Super System model, the global energy infrastructure—worth hundreds of billions—becomes obsolete overnight.


University professors are trapped. To get funding, they have to satisfy the National Science Foundation, which is run by the very people trained in the obsolete U(1) model. It’s a closed loop of intellectual stagnation.


The Path Forward:


If your experiment produces a result that "violates" the model, the model is wrong, not the experiment. We are moving into an era of Engineerable Vacuum Physics. We are learning to build systems that don't just "use" energy, but "gate" it from the infinite reservoir of the time-domain. Don't be afraid of the "dis-equilibrium." That’s where the power is.


The era of the "closed loop" is over. The era of the "Open System" has begun.
The Engineering of the Precipice: Why the "Impossible" is Already Here
.


We are witnessing a rare moment in human history: the birth of an applied science before the theoretical structure has even been "sutured" together. Across the globe, experimenters are achieving results—cold fusion, over-unity, non-exothermic chemical reactions—that the standard models say cannot exist.
The "experts" will tell you that if it isn't in the U(1) model, it's a fraud. They are defending a dogma, not a science. The Scientific Method is clear: if the experiment is repeatable and it refutes the model, you change the model.


The Bell Curve of Scientists:


Scientists are human. They fall on a bell curve. At one end, you have the seekers—those dedicated to the truth no matter where it leads. In the middle, you have the "Broadband"—good people just doing their jobs, never questioning the map they were given.


But at the other end, you have the "Devils." These are the gatekeepers driven by greed, power, and prestige. They control the funding, they peer-review the journals, and they attack anything "out of the box" with a viciousness seldom seen in any other field. They have turned Maxwell’s equations into stone tablets brought down from the mountain.


The Potential Magnitude Fallacy:


Ask any electrical engineer to calculate the magnitude of a potential. They can't do it. What they calculate is only what is diverged from the potential by a small charge.
Think of it this way: The potential is a massive wind blowing across the ocean. The "Poynting component" is the tiny bit of wind that hits your sail. The "Heaviside component" is the rest of the hurricane that misses your boat. The gatekeepers ignore the hurricane because they can't figure out how to tax it. They call it "physically insignificant."


From "Systems" to "Engines in the Vacuum"


In standard chemistry, a molecule is a static structure in flat space-time. But in Higher Symmetry Electromagnetics, we realize that a molecule can be an Engine.
By using curved space-time and active vacuum interactions, we can stabilize molecules that would be "impossible" in a lab.


The Engine: A template of dynamics in the vacuum that works on mass until that mass conforms to the curvature.


Super-System Balance: You can achieve a state where the energy coming out of the vacuum is perfectly balanced by the curvature of space-time.


To a chemist looking through a U(1) lens, your stable molecule looks like a miracle or a mistake. To a Unified Field engineer, it’s just a balanced engine.


The Rice Bowl Problem:


Why is this suppressed? Because this science ruins "Rice Bowls." If you can run a car on water or power a home with a solid-state vacuum gate, hundreds of billions of dollars in infrastructure become scrap metal overnight.


The National Science Foundation and the universities are trapped in an intellectual entropy. They are funded by the status quo to maintain the status quo.
Graduating to a Non-Abelian World
It is time to graduate. Nature is not separated into "Chemistry" and "Physics" and "General Relativity." Nature is unified.


The Vacuum is Active.
Space-Time is Curved.
Time is Energy.


We have the models (Sachs, Evans, Barrett etc....). We have the experiments. We have the proof. We are no longer asking for permission to change the model—we are simply doing the work that the model says can't be done.
Nature works its way, not the Dogma's way. See you at the Precipice.]]>
If you want to understand why the world is in an energy crisis, look no further than the "U(1) Model." That’s the standard, simplified electromagnetics taught in every university. It assumes space-time is flat and the vacuum is empty.


It’s been falsified for nearly a century.
To truly engineer energy—to tap the "Free Energy" of the universe—you have to stop looking at wires and start looking at Potentials.


The Earth as a Living Capacitor:


Normal "fair weather" conditions provide about 150 to 300 volts per meter as you move up from the Earth’s surface. You don’t feel it because your body is "comfortable" in that background. But when a thunderstorm rolls in, that potential drops to zero and reverses. That "stuffy" feeling you get? That’s your biological system reacting to a change in the ambient potential.


Nature is performing a "Roto-Rooter" on your cells, flushing the system with shifting potentials. In my research, I’ve shown that Potential is an inflow of energy from the fourth axis (time) translated into longitudinal wave energy in our 3D space. When you change the potential, you change the rate at which time-energy enters our world.


The "Rotated Frame" Breakthrough


I’ve looked at the machines of many inventors—the ones the "orthodoxy" calls frauds. What they’ve actually found is a way to charge a system in a rotated frame.
By shifting the ambient potential sharply, you essentially rotate the local space-time out of the "lab frame." In this rotated state:


Capacitance changes.
Charge changes.


The rules of "Flat" Physics no longer apply:


If you charge a capacitor in a rotated frame and then "snatch" it back into the lab frame, you get more charge out than you put in. You haven't violated the laws of nature; you’ve just bypassed the "special case" laws that assume space-time can't curve.


The "Super System" vs. The Dogma:


The scientific community is currently locked in a "fundamentalist" religion. They ignore 600+ repeatable experiments in Cold Fusion and Over-Unity because their model says it "can’t happen." That’s not science; that’s Dogma.


To understand these experiments, we must move to Super System Analysis. A Super System consists of three interacting parts:


The Normal System (The wires, the battery, the flat space-time stuff).


The Active Vacuum (The seething sea of energy interacting with every charge).


Local Curvature of Space-Time (The interaction of all masses and charges).


If you aren't analyzing all three, you aren't doing real physics.


Transmuting Chemistry without Chemicals:


We are now at the point where we can use Scalar Wave Technology to change the physical properties of chemicals without changing the chemical itself. The chemists say it’s impossible because they are looking at a "flat" model.


But when you realize that every charge is a broken symmetry—a gate that is constantly pouring energy from the vacuum into our space—you realize that by "tickling" that gate with the right frequency and potential, you can change the very fabric of reality.

We don't need to argue about whether "Free Energy" experiments are real. If they are repeatable, they are real. We need to argue about the Model.

The U(1) model is a bicycle; we are trying to fly a starship.


It’s time to move to higher-group symmetries—non-Abelian electromagnetics—and start engineering the vacuum. The models exist (Evans, Sachs, Barrett). The experiments are done. The only thing left is to break the mindset.
The model isn't the reality. The experiment is.


The Source Charge Secret: Why Every Electron is a Free Energy Machine



If you take a single charge and put it on a table, it immediately starts radiating electromagnetic energy in all directions at the speed of light. If that charge stays there for a century, it creates a field that reaches out a hundred light-years.


Where is that energy coming from?


The "orthodoxy" has no answer. They violate the conservation of energy every day by pretending this energy is just "there" without a source. I call this the Source Charge Problem. To solve it, we have to look where the textbooks refuse to go: the Fourth Dimension—Time.


The Charge as a Gated Dipole:


A charge is not a static ball; it is a broken symmetry in the vacuum flux. Think of it like a whirlpool in a river. The water (energy) isn't "created" by the whirlpool; it flows in from the environment.


In the case of an electron, the energy is flowing in from the Time Domain (the 4th axis). The particle’s "spin" is the mechanism. It absorbs non-observable energy from the time axis, rotates it, and pours it out into our 3D space as longitudinal EM waves.
Time is Compressed Energy (E=mt2)


We all know Einstein’s E=mc2. But most people don't realize that Time itself is pure energy, compressed by the factor of c2. Time has the same energy density as mass.
When a source charge "consumes" time, it is converting a massive amount of temporal potential into spatial energy. This is why Nikola Tesla was so interested in low frequencies. In a photon, if you decrease the spatial energy (frequency), the amount of time-energy it carries goes up. The real "High Energy Physics" isn't in massive colliders; it's in the low-frequency conversion of time into power.


The 5 "Magic" Functions of an Open System:


By using the time-domain as our source, we move from "Equilibrium Thermodynamics" (where you always lose) to Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics (where you can win). As Ilya Prigogine proved in his Nobel-winning work, an open system far from equilibrium can:


Self-Order: Structure emerges from chaos automatically.


Self-Oscillate: It can maintain its own pulse.


Output more energy than you put in: It taps the environment (the vacuum).


Power itself in a load: It becomes a self-sustaining circuit.


Produce Negative Energy: It can actually cool the environment while providing power (convergent energy).


Breaking the U(1) Dogma:


The reason your local physics professor will call this "impossible" is because he is trapped in the U(1) Electrodynamics model. This model was built on the assumption of a flat space-time and an empty vacuum. It was falsified in 1957 when Lee and Yang won the Nobel Prize for discovering Broken Symmetry.


If the symmetry is broken, the conservation of energy must be calculated across the entire system—including the vacuum and the time-domain. When you do that, "Over-Unity" isn't a violation of law; it's an inevitable result of open-system engineering.



We are surrounded by a sea of energy so dense that a coffee cup’s worth of "empty space" could boil the world’s oceans. The source charge is nature’s way of showing us the door is already open.


Stop trying to "make" energy. Start learning how to gate the energy that is already pouring through every atom in your body.



Beyond the "Rowboat" Equations: Engineering the Super System



The standard thermodynamics you were taught in school is a lie of omission. They taught you the Second Law, which says everything must decay into disorder. But they forgot to tell you that the Second Law only applies to closed systems in equilibrium.
Every charge and every dipole in the universe is a Broken Symmetry. It is an open system, constantly exchanging energy with the time-domain. Nature has been running a "Giant Negentropy" operation for 14 billion years. If the "laws" of the 19th century were absolute, the universe would have run out of gas a long time ago.


The Death of the U(1) Model:


Our current electrical engineering and chemistry are based on the U(1) model. This model assumes a flat space-time and no interaction with the vacuum. It was created by Oliver Heaviside and refined by Lorentz in the 1880s—before we even discovered the electron!


They "symmetrized" Maxwell’s original equations because they were too hard to solve by hand. They threw out the "messy" parts to make the math easier. In doing so, they threw out the ability to model Over-Unity and Cold Fusion. They threw out the "Super System."


What is a Super System?


To understand the "anomalies" in your lab, you have to stop looking at the "System" and start looking at the "Super System." It has three components:


The Physical Apparatus: The wires, the chemicals, the battery.


The Active Local Vacuum: The seething energy flux that interacts with every charge.


Local Curvature of Space-Time: The gravitational and temporal warping caused by high-potential gradients.


When these three interact, you get "magic." You get reactions that don't produce heat (exothermic suppression) because the energy is being shunted into a rotated frame. You are charging the system in "Time" and discharging it in "Space."


The "Sachs" and "Evans" Solutions:


We don't have to guess how this works. The models already exist in higher-symmetry physics:


Sachs Unified Field Theory: A model that is completely engineerable and includes the vacuum in every calculation.
O(3) Electrodynamics: Developed by Dr. Myron Evans, this model accounts for the longitudinal waves that the standard U(1) model ignores.
SU(2) Group Symmetry: Used by researchers like Dr. Barrett to explain ultra-wideband phenomena and higher-order EM interactions.


The Business of Suppression:


Why aren't these taught in universities? Follow the money. If we move to a Super System model, the global energy infrastructure—worth hundreds of billions—becomes obsolete overnight.


University professors are trapped. To get funding, they have to satisfy the National Science Foundation, which is run by the very people trained in the obsolete U(1) model. It’s a closed loop of intellectual stagnation.


The Path Forward:


If your experiment produces a result that "violates" the model, the model is wrong, not the experiment. We are moving into an era of Engineerable Vacuum Physics. We are learning to build systems that don't just "use" energy, but "gate" it from the infinite reservoir of the time-domain. Don't be afraid of the "dis-equilibrium." That’s where the power is.


The era of the "closed loop" is over. The era of the "Open System" has begun.
The Engineering of the Precipice: Why the "Impossible" is Already Here
.


We are witnessing a rare moment in human history: the birth of an applied science before the theoretical structure has even been "sutured" together. Across the globe, experimenters are achieving results—cold fusion, over-unity, non-exothermic chemical reactions—that the standard models say cannot exist.
The "experts" will tell you that if it isn't in the U(1) model, it's a fraud. They are defending a dogma, not a science. The Scientific Method is clear: if the experiment is repeatable and it refutes the model, you change the model.


The Bell Curve of Scientists:


Scientists are human. They fall on a bell curve. At one end, you have the seekers—those dedicated to the truth no matter where it leads. In the middle, you have the "Broadband"—good people just doing their jobs, never questioning the map they were given.


But at the other end, you have the "Devils." These are the gatekeepers driven by greed, power, and prestige. They control the funding, they peer-review the journals, and they attack anything "out of the box" with a viciousness seldom seen in any other field. They have turned Maxwell’s equations into stone tablets brought down from the mountain.


The Potential Magnitude Fallacy:


Ask any electrical engineer to calculate the magnitude of a potential. They can't do it. What they calculate is only what is diverged from the potential by a small charge.
Think of it this way: The potential is a massive wind blowing across the ocean. The "Poynting component" is the tiny bit of wind that hits your sail. The "Heaviside component" is the rest of the hurricane that misses your boat. The gatekeepers ignore the hurricane because they can't figure out how to tax it. They call it "physically insignificant."


From "Systems" to "Engines in the Vacuum"


In standard chemistry, a molecule is a static structure in flat space-time. But in Higher Symmetry Electromagnetics, we realize that a molecule can be an Engine.
By using curved space-time and active vacuum interactions, we can stabilize molecules that would be "impossible" in a lab.


The Engine: A template of dynamics in the vacuum that works on mass until that mass conforms to the curvature.


Super-System Balance: You can achieve a state where the energy coming out of the vacuum is perfectly balanced by the curvature of space-time.


To a chemist looking through a U(1) lens, your stable molecule looks like a miracle or a mistake. To a Unified Field engineer, it’s just a balanced engine.


The Rice Bowl Problem:


Why is this suppressed? Because this science ruins "Rice Bowls." If you can run a car on water or power a home with a solid-state vacuum gate, hundreds of billions of dollars in infrastructure become scrap metal overnight.


The National Science Foundation and the universities are trapped in an intellectual entropy. They are funded by the status quo to maintain the status quo.
Graduating to a Non-Abelian World
It is time to graduate. Nature is not separated into "Chemistry" and "Physics" and "General Relativity." Nature is unified.


The Vacuum is Active.
Space-Time is Curved.
Time is Energy.


We have the models (Sachs, Evans, Barrett etc....). We have the experiments. We have the proof. We are no longer asking for permission to change the model—we are simply doing the work that the model says can't be done.
Nature works its way, not the Dogma's way. See you at the Precipice.]]> <![CDATA[Arie Melis De Geus Conversion of ZPE]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=534 Sun, 11 Jan 2026 15:33:42 +0100 Lord Wizzy]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=534
Have you ever heard about the Dutch inventor/scientist Arie Melis De Geus?
I didn't and it's pretty hard to find info about him and his theories.
He was possibly silenced in 2007, (that tells something ...) read: https://rexresearch.com/degeus/degeus.htm

Why I'm mentioning him is because one of his patents (Conversion of ZPE in additional kinetic energy of electrons NL1030697C1) got my interest and seems to have a lot in common with Don Smith, maybe some missing links from Don can be found in this patent because it's pretty detailed.
For me it's way above my level of understanding, maybe you should take a look at it and get some useful information out of it: https://www.scribd.com/document/735946708/NL1030697

Other patents on his name: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/r...9SO9-51331 (fill in 'Arie De Geus' ).]]>
Have you ever heard about the Dutch inventor/scientist Arie Melis De Geus?
I didn't and it's pretty hard to find info about him and his theories.
He was possibly silenced in 2007, (that tells something ...) read: https://rexresearch.com/degeus/degeus.htm

Why I'm mentioning him is because one of his patents (Conversion of ZPE in additional kinetic energy of electrons NL1030697C1) got my interest and seems to have a lot in common with Don Smith, maybe some missing links from Don can be found in this patent because it's pretty detailed.
For me it's way above my level of understanding, maybe you should take a look at it and get some useful information out of it: https://www.scribd.com/document/735946708/NL1030697

Other patents on his name: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/r...9SO9-51331 (fill in 'Arie De Geus' ).]]> <![CDATA[Russian Tesla coil setup powers light bulb for 90s after briefly exciting primary]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=532 Sun, 16 Nov 2025 20:24:23 +0100 ScalarPotential]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=532
YouTube's auto-dubbing has many mistakes and for some reason the original Russian transcript isn't available so an accurate translation can't be made without first processing the Russian audio with speech-to-text. Perhaps there's someone who's fluent in Russian on this forum who could translate the key details accurately.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei8C4DdEuUo

Circuit diagram:

[Image: kpVbCcCOWn6XZ7VL5TYptNjDbgX7sbXLzve4MQHE...0-rw-nd-v1]

Comment made by author on diagram post (translated to English):

Quote:As you know, a quarter-wavelength works for external radiation, but a half-wavelength is a completely different matter. A standing wave is formed in the coil, which draws the external vortex into the receiving coil during avalanche formation, causing some amplification as it repeatedly reflects off the ground through the grounding. When the solar cell circuit is properly configured for standing waves, energy is released in a huge stream, and the primary response is precisely the control of the energy flow and its concentration. The most difficult task is to calculate the load on the receiving circuit to achieve a balance between collapse and maintaining generation, while simultaneously remembering that the avalanche process can proceed unpredictably, releasing and drawing in new portions of unsettled Ether.
]]>
YouTube's auto-dubbing has many mistakes and for some reason the original Russian transcript isn't available so an accurate translation can't be made without first processing the Russian audio with speech-to-text. Perhaps there's someone who's fluent in Russian on this forum who could translate the key details accurately.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei8C4DdEuUo

Circuit diagram:

[Image: kpVbCcCOWn6XZ7VL5TYptNjDbgX7sbXLzve4MQHE...0-rw-nd-v1]

Comment made by author on diagram post (translated to English):

Quote:As you know, a quarter-wavelength works for external radiation, but a half-wavelength is a completely different matter. A standing wave is formed in the coil, which draws the external vortex into the receiving coil during avalanche formation, causing some amplification as it repeatedly reflects off the ground through the grounding. When the solar cell circuit is properly configured for standing waves, energy is released in a huge stream, and the primary response is precisely the control of the energy flow and its concentration. The most difficult task is to calculate the load on the receiving circuit to achieve a balance between collapse and maintaining generation, while simultaneously remembering that the avalanche process can proceed unpredictably, releasing and drawing in new portions of unsettled Ether.
]]> <![CDATA[My generator that rotates itself]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=530 Sun, 02 Nov 2025 16:47:52 +0100 Mooker]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=530
]]>
]]> <![CDATA[Free energy from Earth's ground]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=529 Fri, 24 Oct 2025 22:56:47 +0200 vnachow]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=529
-You get a good deep ground (use a coax cable and copper plates).
-Then you need capacitors (lots of copper plates + thin myca or gypsum layers, stacked an well insulated) (optional)
- You need to step up the current in a way enough to produce a spark, what we do is basically use a tesla coil setting (can experiment to add a step up transformer from Ground wire too)
- You need a mechanical oscillator, depends on the atmospheric conditions need to be able to modulate the frequency of connecting and disconnecting the Earth.
- On the top side of our capacitor (which is charged by our secondary coil) we add an antenna.

What they did improperly with the athmosphere energy harvesters is that the antenna didn't had enough capacitance with low impedance, and that the potentials cancel out. What you need to do is charge up the antenna with the very ground (we get a large postive potential), then you disconnect the ground, and then resonate the antenna (can use a subwoover to make it vibrate), the potential quickly changes from positive to negative. Basically we create an active energy funnel. We can get enormous amounts of energy during lighting storms (be careful to put some good fuses so you don't get your system melted if a lightning hits it), even if the storms are far away, the earth begins ringing for a long time so you can get even better results. 

The more potential you can excite your system with, and then release it as quickly as possible using the subwoover for mechanical vibration, the better, als of course a taller and larger antenna is also a help, be sure you insulate all exposed parts except the antenna head and the ground plates. 

Another way to do it is to simply get the ground wire, make a good thick wired coil, and then put into an iron rod and vibrate it mechanically across the coil (subwoover) to pickup the current, at the other side pass it through an alternator, now your ground wire is the phase and the 0 is the antenna.

I have also a small theory which involves UV laser pointed upwards which creates an ionised plasma connection with the upper ionosphere (or at least the clouds) then use this as your antenna for dissipating your ground current. (experimental idea not sure if this last thing will work as expected.]]>
-You get a good deep ground (use a coax cable and copper plates).
-Then you need capacitors (lots of copper plates + thin myca or gypsum layers, stacked an well insulated) (optional)
- You need to step up the current in a way enough to produce a spark, what we do is basically use a tesla coil setting (can experiment to add a step up transformer from Ground wire too)
- You need a mechanical oscillator, depends on the atmospheric conditions need to be able to modulate the frequency of connecting and disconnecting the Earth.
- On the top side of our capacitor (which is charged by our secondary coil) we add an antenna.

What they did improperly with the athmosphere energy harvesters is that the antenna didn't had enough capacitance with low impedance, and that the potentials cancel out. What you need to do is charge up the antenna with the very ground (we get a large postive potential), then you disconnect the ground, and then resonate the antenna (can use a subwoover to make it vibrate), the potential quickly changes from positive to negative. Basically we create an active energy funnel. We can get enormous amounts of energy during lighting storms (be careful to put some good fuses so you don't get your system melted if a lightning hits it), even if the storms are far away, the earth begins ringing for a long time so you can get even better results. 

The more potential you can excite your system with, and then release it as quickly as possible using the subwoover for mechanical vibration, the better, als of course a taller and larger antenna is also a help, be sure you insulate all exposed parts except the antenna head and the ground plates. 

Another way to do it is to simply get the ground wire, make a good thick wired coil, and then put into an iron rod and vibrate it mechanically across the coil (subwoover) to pickup the current, at the other side pass it through an alternator, now your ground wire is the phase and the 0 is the antenna.

I have also a small theory which involves UV laser pointed upwards which creates an ionised plasma connection with the upper ionosphere (or at least the clouds) then use this as your antenna for dissipating your ground current. (experimental idea not sure if this last thing will work as expected.]]> <![CDATA[Self Looped Bedini Motor of Joel LAgace]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=527 Wed, 22 Oct 2025 20:42:38 +0200 sinergicus]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=527 Self Looped Bedini Motor - YouTube   ...Personaly I tried ,but probabbly I made some  mistakes ... In clasical fashion , diode from colector are conected to + of charging battery and  + from power battery are going to minus of charging battery , So in my settup the conection from colector diode and plus from the power source was made to primary of 20 wraps of isolation transformer made on small toroidal core( like Joel did) ... the output secondary    transformer  was conected to a capacitor via another diode to see if the transformer effect is produced ... no rise in voltage in capacitor.... I dont know  why... maybe  the spike is too weqak and have no power to induce in secondary   or I made some  conections  mistakes?  so please ,if somebody can make a schematic with clear conections  will be great apreciated ....]]> Self Looped Bedini Motor - YouTube   ...Personaly I tried ,but probabbly I made some  mistakes ... In clasical fashion , diode from colector are conected to + of charging battery and  + from power battery are going to minus of charging battery , So in my settup the conection from colector diode and plus from the power source was made to primary of 20 wraps of isolation transformer made on small toroidal core( like Joel did) ... the output secondary    transformer  was conected to a capacitor via another diode to see if the transformer effect is produced ... no rise in voltage in capacitor.... I dont know  why... maybe  the spike is too weqak and have no power to induce in secondary   or I made some  conections  mistakes?  so please ,if somebody can make a schematic with clear conections  will be great apreciated ....]]> <![CDATA[What can I do with all this ethernet cable]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=526 Tue, 19 Aug 2025 10:31:09 +0200 weighta]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=526
I haven't touched any energy projects in a while, but have accumulated a bunch of ethernet cable over the years -- What should I do with it?

[Image: s1evVXa.jpg]

[Image: KLwsR5V.jpg]

[Image: zJAcNXB.jpg]

[Image: YgIXmGw.jpg]

[Image: IAfJIXR.jpg]

--What's the best energy output I can make with all this stuff? I want to build another circuit but don't know which - don smith, bedini, meyer, etc.  Thank you Joel for all your discoveries.

Thanks for your suggestions,

Alex]]>
I haven't touched any energy projects in a while, but have accumulated a bunch of ethernet cable over the years -- What should I do with it?

[Image: s1evVXa.jpg]

[Image: KLwsR5V.jpg]

[Image: zJAcNXB.jpg]

[Image: YgIXmGw.jpg]

[Image: IAfJIXR.jpg]

--What's the best energy output I can make with all this stuff? I want to build another circuit but don't know which - don smith, bedini, meyer, etc.  Thank you Joel for all your discoveries.

Thanks for your suggestions,

Alex]]> <![CDATA[Ebner field]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=523 Mon, 10 Mar 2025 11:41:17 +0100 ephemeralt8]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=523
If biology can do it, there may be a way, there doesn't appear to be a load on the system 

http://rexresearch.com/ebner/ebner.htm]]>
If biology can do it, there may be a way, there doesn't appear to be a load on the system 

http://rexresearch.com/ebner/ebner.htm]]> <![CDATA[How can you Accelerate light at Home]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=520 Sat, 08 Mar 2025 00:28:26 +0100 ephemeralt8]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=520
https://youtu.be/QdhNwoLYmk8?feature=shared

https://youtu.be/_rtsNVfabFM?feature=shared]]>
https://youtu.be/QdhNwoLYmk8?feature=shared

https://youtu.be/_rtsNVfabFM?feature=shared]]> <![CDATA[Doug Konzen Electromagnetic Pulse Motor]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=515 Wed, 01 Jan 2025 17:13:35 +0100 Pass]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=515 Anyone heard of this guy?
Doug Konzen, also known as "Kone," is an inventor recognized for developing the Konehead Pulse Motor, an electromagnetic pulse motor designed to achieve overunity. His designs draw inspiration from the work of John Bedini and E.V. Gray, focusing on pulse motor circuits that utilize magnetic repulsion and innovative coil configurations to enhance efficiency.

Video:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Q3cOKMvD2BUS/]]> Anyone heard of this guy?
Doug Konzen, also known as "Kone," is an inventor recognized for developing the Konehead Pulse Motor, an electromagnetic pulse motor designed to achieve overunity. His designs draw inspiration from the work of John Bedini and E.V. Gray, focusing on pulse motor circuits that utilize magnetic repulsion and innovative coil configurations to enhance efficiency.

Video:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Q3cOKMvD2BUS/]]> <![CDATA[Don Smith Reactive Method]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=513 Tue, 17 Dec 2024 05:40:53 +0100 tachyoncatcher]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=513 <![CDATA[diode cascade]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=506 Mon, 11 Nov 2024 10:52:19 +0100 freemind]]> http://typeright.social/forum/showthread.php?tid=506 The voltage at the output increases while maintaining the same input-output current. Since P=U*I, theoretically, a higher power output is possible at the output compared to the input. With a stepped cascade of 12V 12mA input, one could achieve several watts of gain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage_multiplier
Have I overlooked something?


ChatGPT Part:
The voltage at the output increases while maintaining the same input current. Since P=U*I, theoretically, a higher power output would be possible at the output compared to the input. With a stepped cascade of 12V 12mA input, one could achieve several watts of gain.
If energy from the surroundings is introduced into the system, similar to how a heat pump works, this could explain the increased power output.]]> The voltage at the output increases while maintaining the same input-output current. Since P=U*I, theoretically, a higher power output is possible at the output compared to the input. With a stepped cascade of 12V 12mA input, one could achieve several watts of gain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage_multiplier
Have I overlooked something?


ChatGPT Part:
The voltage at the output increases while maintaining the same input current. Since P=U*I, theoretically, a higher power output would be possible at the output compared to the input. With a stepped cascade of 12V 12mA input, one could achieve several watts of gain.
If energy from the surroundings is introduced into the system, similar to how a heat pump works, this could explain the increased power output.]]>